YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

F-16 MATV Axisymmetric vectoring in the early 1990's.

jumpsweet jumpsweet·5 videos
36
147,041
Like     Dislike 22

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like jumpsweet's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike jumpsweet's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add jumpsweet's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Mar 5, 2007

This is a video of the F-16 MATV using axisymmetric thrust vectoring in the early 90's..years before the Mig-29 OVT. The video showing the nozzles moving in the video is in a slowed down video frame rate mode.

The jet was one of a few different jets like the X-31, NF-16D, F-18 HARV and F-15 ACTIVE used to study the gains and weak points of thrust vectoring and axisymmetric thrust vectoring. All the test work on these jets went into the F-22.

It was learned only so much can be gained by axisymmetric thrust vectoring in terms of how it could help a fighter jet in air to air combat. The truth is, high AOA maneuvers should only be a last-ditch operation in aerial combat in view of the increased vulnerability of the aircraft when it is in a low-energy state. The F-22 has pitch vectoring for any kind of last-ditch operations but, the study helped prove stealth, radar range, real time data updates for targeting are better over all tools in modern air to air combat.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • suraxis

    Seeing an f-16 doing a Pugachev Cobra... FUCKING AWESOME.

    · 20

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate suraxis's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate suraxis's comment.
  • Wesley Prevot

    why don't they just use upgraded F-16s and F-18s with thrust vectoring instead of using the F-35?

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Wesley Prevot's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Wesley Prevot's comment.

All Comments (161)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • MrArioch11

    because they dont have stealth capabilities

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrArioch11's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrArioch11's comment.
    in reply to Wesley Prevot (Show the comment)
  • Zhanrae30

    0:10 you spin me right round baby right round like a record baby right round right round

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zhanrae30's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Zhanrae30's comment.
  • VIEultimate

    i just wish the F-15 ACTIVE, F-16 MATV, and F-18 HARV would be massively produced. they're better that their "uncustomized" version.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate VIEultimate's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate VIEultimate's comment.
  • beaggyboy

    less than half d'cost,that of d'F22s),can be inducted en mass to completely replace all its current fleet of legend fighterjets.Besides,these earlier gen acraft,if w/d'suggested improvement to agility added,that wud evn make for better foreign sales amongst allies,as confidence is restored

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.
    in reply to ArmyAbrams Tanker (Show the comment)
  • beaggyboy

    Tho l wudnt vouch too muc for 1 of these,but d'F16,a piece of shit!?,is it?,l dont think so,not for a sec.For especially it & d'F15,evn d'F18,all have muc muc mor life to offer,that is,provided if at all the lofty so-called thinkers or shot-calling fellows are willing to listen & allow TVN inductions into all acrafts in their inventory,as F22 numbers're now limited by cost prohibitions,evn if w/another 200 added,still that duznt complement US forces' immense dimensions & not evn d'F35(wic is

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.
    in reply to ArmyAbrams Tanker (Show the comment)
  • suraxis

    We live in a time where the majority of all aerial conflicts are executed at beyond visual range. Maneuverability in a manned fighter was meant for close quarters, guns and short range missile engagements. Thrust vectoring is great, but so much more a novelty item these days. Also, replying to a 3 year old comment...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate suraxis's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate suraxis's comment.
    in reply to beaggyboy (Show the comment)
  • beaggyboy

    Yes,it is Fuckin Awsome aint it?The brilliant Americans were the very 1st to've invented Thrust-Vectoring aero-engine Nozzles in the F16 MATV/AVEN w/GE's F110*engine? & super-maneuvering with Germans in the X-31 alone,along w/the above mentioned F16 & F18 HARV.But its shot-callers was dim-witted,lacked foresight or rather oversighted the idea at no fault of its original concept creators.The Russians have now seemed to have hijacked all glory,where maneuverability's concerned w/their SU30s>family

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.
    in reply to suraxis (Show the comment)
  • beaggyboy

    Correct,when missiles're out,d'only available option's to go fa d'guns & waht,win d'fight,huh?From wat we know of today's AA rounds(other than the provided explosive kinetic-energy charge in the rear casings,the tip is but usually only dead 20/25 or 30mm caliber piercers),not smart bullets,YET!,they cant go around & tail d'enemy until impact like missiles.How then wud U suggest to've a resounding advantage,when piercers' trajectory travel in almost linear & we simply cant out-swing SU30 examples

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.
    in reply to ArmyAbrams Tanker (Show the comment)
  • beaggyboy

    l'm with U.Hay.hay,U really know a thing or two,dont cha.Kudos! & the F15 tho still a very good fighterjet,but simply cant.The reason being that..(please read further up there in my reply to Stickman193,if U like to).By so doing it wud return the US back on the #1 spot of Air-Forces chart having the very best fighterjet,sinz it already is THE! best Air-Force,in absence only of an exceptionally maneuverable acraft.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate beaggyboy's comment.
    in reply to Wesley Prevot (Show the comment)
  • XaHyMaH

    Now try it without TVC =)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XaHyMaH's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XaHyMaH's comment.
    in reply to suraxis (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later