The Fine Tuning Argument Debunked

Debunking the fine tuned universe argument of William Lane Craig, Adam Deen, Hamza Tzortzis and many other theists.
Some links as requested
http://www.counterbalance.org/cqinter...
http://www.scientificamerican.com/art...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphica...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/...
http://www.physorg.com/news/2010-12-s...
http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.1995
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/ho...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/...
http://arxiv.org/abs/0807.3697
http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap...
http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2197
any more available on request

• Category

  Science & Technology

[Roqqentin]

Sorry, Is there any transcript of this video? I'll translate it to Turkish and I need this transcript.. :/

[skydivephil]

Ill try and find something, if I do how do I get it to you?

[SAMUEL ARTHUR]

Because the best current cosmology says the universe had a beginning.

[gerhitchman]

Why do you think the universe needs a cause?

We know that large scale chunks of matter *within* our universe have a cause... but why does the universe need a cause?

Be humble, silly Christian.

[Cem BAYRAK]

Please, try to translate it to Turkish. (We all need it. I can understand this video clearly but the video about Kalam Argument isn't so clear for me, because of my English :) (so I want you to translate notonlythis video but also that one: /watch?v=baZUCc5m8sE . Actually, Greener Nautilus has already made a video about the fine tuned universe argument. (He also used some examples from this video, you can find.) (And also, sorry for my English)

[Roper122]

OK.. put it his way.

- You don't know that the universe only supports life here, in fact it's unlikely

- the laws of physics aren't precise in that way, that's the whole point of the video above.

- a naturalistic explanation, and the limitations of our current knowledge seems even more plausible to me.

- a multiverse is simply multiplying what we already have.

I respect your right to have an opinion.

[gangster3591]

"Where did the singularity come from? To deny an eternal creative power leaves the illogical framework of something from nothing, aka magic"

A little smug in your certitude, aren't you Mr Johnson?

What exactly is god, and where did it come from?

Why does an uncreated 'god' make more sense than an uncreated universe?

Until you can answer such questions, you have no business giving lectures on what is and what isn't logical

[Roqqentin]

Very very thank you sir.

bunungibi@gmail.com

this is my e mail adress. You can send me a document. :)

[ezseminole]

Roper. Sorry I did not say that clearly. I meant that the universe only supporting life on Earth suggests that we are the purpose of it all somehow. The laws a physics seem unimaginably precise in their values to allow our lives. The odds of the values all occurring accidentally are essentially zero in math terms. How do we explain that? A non-specific intelligence capable of designing the universe for life seems plausible to me. More so than a multiverse. I respect your view though.

[Roper122]

Well then show us the nothing...

Why is this so hard to grasp?

All you have to do is show us absolute nothing.

You can't have it both ways.

Good Luck.