Watch this video in a new window

A Bright Future for Some

This ad focuses on the impact that Al Gore's proposed energy restrictions would have on the world's poor, and highlights the hypocrisy of Mr. Gore's own high-energy lifestyle. For more informatio...  
 
Customize

More From: CEIdotorg

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
76 ratings
Sign in to rate
24,936 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (96)   Options

Loading...
ackanob (9 months ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
he's not trying to remove affordable energy just raise awareness of its effects and inform us about cleaner renewable energy as opposed to dirty coal that increases greenhouse gases.
nonsensemusic (10 months ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
this is an attack on Gore and not on his cause ... very petty, libertarians
phantomlimb33 (11 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
Oh come on.
This is making such bold claims that can't be supported. Showing images of babies, school children and people living in poverty just to tug at the heartstrings isn't enough to make the argument valid. Al Gore is not being selfish and hypocritical, if we don't help stop (or as much as we can do) global warming, then no one will be well off.
balmung789 (1 year ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Haha, you guys crack me up.
Comment(s) marked as spam Show
SauceMystery (1 year ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
Peer-reviewed :

showing computer climate model outputs not matching observation, in other words, what the computer models predict isn't happening :

Complete PDF available to read free online. From abstract :

"These conclusions contrast strongly with those of recent publications... Copyright 2007 Royal Meteorological Society.... Received 31 May 2007; Accepted 11 October 2007"

search :


International Journal of Climatology of the Royal Meteorological Society [DOI: 10.1002/joc.1651]
flyamanita (1 year ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Sources of data plz. I don't get what's being argued here; is it that the quantity of CO2 is insignificant or is it that even if it is, there's a natural global warming occurring anyway? What was with the claim of a cooling trend in 1998 when temps shot up around 2000? And are people seriously using the last two years as an example that temperatures are going to drop? I dunno, I think I'd look at the 5 year average, or some other part of the bigger picture. These arguments are pretty weak, guys.
SauceMystery (1 year ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
flyam

"the claim of a cooling trend in 1998 when temps shot up around 2000?"

No year since 1998 has been as warm or warmer than 1998. Also, there has been dramatic cooling since early 2007.
TheSharpenedPen (1 year ago) Show Hide
+4
Marked as spam
Thanks for clarifying that. Our contribution to Global warming is ludicrous. This is a scam designed to establish what they call "global governance" & "civil society". If mankind is responsible for global warming, given our minuscule contributions, then that means that the earth's ecosystem is incredibly fragile. It would also mean that there is no way in hell that we could ever hope to turn the trend around. Luckily, we're not the cause and the earth is already cooling.
superlulucake (6 months ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
our ecosystem IS incredibly fragile

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.