The design argument
Uploader Comments (TheLittleDonkey)
Video Responses
All Comments (7)
-
Holy craptastic! I liked Dumbski when I first heard of ID, but misusing mathematics is sacrilege in the house of january. I hope I never meet this fool on the street... I ended up researching cutting-edge hypotheses on emergence to falsify his math... then went back to Godel's Incompleteness... which these fools seem to love, but actually turns them into fools.. then went into philosophy, and now I wonder what Godel was on about... what is "false?" I'm gonna do some intelligent undesigning... ;)
-
I remember coming to this exact conclusion back when most creationists were peddling that lame example of finding a painting in the forest, or finding writing in the sand and saying you know it was designed. The hilarious irony being that these examples only point out the obvious distinction between that which is designed, and isn't. I wanted to ask them why there was a difference between the painting and the forest they find it in.
-
Yes, but so is evolution.
The point here is that even if ID was science, and design by God could be detected, and there was a creator God, it should detect design in everything, including snowflakes.
Thanks for your comment
-
Another rebuttal might be an example of things which are both highly complex, yet obviously formed naturally, such as snowflakes.
In fact, the probability against the exact crystal formation of any individual snowflake is astronomical.
Nevertheless, the chemistry behind crystal formation in freezing water is fairly well understood.
Newton's law says anything that exsists or happens, has a cause that sets it in motion. No matter which way you cut it science can only explain things so far in this "observable universe". The laws of our universe were supposedly set in place by the big bang. In order to explain what caused the big bang you have to tap into newtons laws which didn't exsist before the big bang. The bible claims that God created time and lives outside of it and uses that along with natural resources he created.
bigwiggles 3 years ago
ehum, no. Newtons' laws does cover "what exists or happens".
If you want to claim that God is supernatural, that's fine. This video doesn't address that.
TheLittleDonkey 3 years ago
It's been said but why would an intelligent designer allow for millions of species only to have them go extinct. Is he (she?) so cavelier or inmpotent that they operate only once in Earth history? Why not give nature a helping hand now and then?
smb12321 3 years ago
That is a vaild point
TheLittleDonkey 3 years ago
awesome!!!!
Hollenthon2468 3 years ago
Thank you sir
TheLittleDonkey 3 years ago