Joseph Smith's Bible Translation and Effective Evangelism, by Kurt Van Gorden
Uploader Comments (aaronshaf2006)
All Comments (37)
-
Amazing how Satan uses these useful idiots...so called self proclaimed spokesmen of God to deliver his message. Beware of these false prophets & false christs among you..
-
Nice message. Are you under the impression that I'm a Mormon??
-
@CounterCultureLives lifting of the curse? haha. You mean, politically correct inversion of the religion. The book of Abraham was a fraud. The other books you have Joseph Smith copied someone elses work and it has been proven. Paul said if anyone else or an angel from heaven preached any other gospel let him be accursed. Smith is accursed and burning in hell for his deception. Dont follow his testimony, get your own testimony. We overcome by the blood of the lamb and by the word of our testimony
-
HELP WANTED!! Must Be Willing To Relocate!!
The elevation of black people to eligibility for the LDS Priesthood has created a need for experienced servants in The Celestial Kingdom. Since the "lifting of the curse", "the blacks" may now enter The Celestial Kingdom without having to be servants. This has created new opportunities for employment in The Celestial Kingdom
.
Servants Are Needed NOW!! History of 10% Tithing Required.
Call 1-800-737-8268 That's 1-800-SER-VANT
"Se Habla Lamanite!!"
-
The Mormons ordained black people. It was not racist. The Book of Mormon says that you will not be punished for the sins of your fathers. One fault in the his argument.
-
Yes... but what sign would help a sign seeker?
-
@apocalypse1280 lol..lol..lol
-
@61MAF Actually Nahom has been found.
Kirt eludes to a false idea that Mormons are afraid of original text. He mentions "Bible Software," My guess is he is referring to Logos Bible software, which I use regularly to study Greek and Hebrew. The problem is he is misleading his audience to believe that the 3rdC and 4thC fragments and manuscripts we have are "originals." They are not, we do not have original manuscripts, that is the ultimate failure of the concept of Biblical inerrancy. It is a false premise.
urloony 1 year ago
@urloony We do not need originals to reconstruct the originals. If that isn't the case, then you can't even trust the BofM itself as reliably reflecting the original English manuscript.
aaronshaf2006 1 year ago