Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

How To Never Be Wrong

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
10,475
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 20, 2009

The definitive guide to never losing an argument.

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (deRoyLight)

  • How orwellin to say dictionaries do not define words. Iet's go by the constitution.

    Homosexuals were/are not enslaved people. Marriage is not a right. Can you please point to where it says in the constitution the govenrment has the right to enforce marriage on people? Your comparing apples to walnuts. They don't even carry equal moral weight and it's insulting to suggest that they do.

  • You misunderstand me when I say rights. We do not make laws restricting the minority without secular reasons to do so.

  • That's not what I said. I simplely said

    many bad behaviors happen in nature, but that doesn't mean we should consider homosexuality "moral" and/or "lawful". Moreover, Alot of bad behaviors happens in nature, but that doesn't mean these bad behaviors are logical. We exhibit alot of these bad behaviors that aren't moral or logical, and laws are put into place to stop us from runining society with them. Do you lack ethics?

  • Dude, lash. Once again. You're not establishing anything.

    All you are doing is pointing out the obvious.

    All you have done, once again, use go the triangle route. I keep saying it, because you keep doing it. You're not establishing why said action is immoral, you're just claiming that because it is natural does not make it moral. Great. You still haven't established your point.

  • I didn't make a claim I asked a question.

    You made a claim by providing your twin study. I simplely countered by saying correlation does not imply causation. This means correlation between two variables does not automatically imply that one causes the other. Which is true. Noone exactly knows for sure if homosexuality has anything to do with genetics. Yet you keep acting like it's definitive. When it's not.

  • The reference to the twin study was to point out the irony that you would even try to bring twins into the discussion as if that somehow disproved a biological basis, when such studies have only provided support for a biological basis.

Top Comments

  • oooohhh it's seems to me that church will sued you to give this instruction just for free man. They have the patents of this method

  • great vid, thanks for directing me to it

    until the person facepalms himself . . . to death haha

Video Responses

This video is a response to Unnatural?
see all

All Comments (113)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @deRoyLight

    I don't care what two consenting adults do.

    It don't create babies,so why would it create Marriage.Union of flesh,there can be no union between two of the same sex.

    Aids was created in a lab to create strife between Straight & Gays.

    Also Zeus can be dis-proven:He is supposedly GOD of the universe,but a GOD could not be of the universe,GOD would precede the universe.A master of matter manipulation would hold no power over a master not made of matter.Dark matter sounds cool huh?

  • this is dumb -.-

  • heres what you do when someone brings up part five "my god said so" ask if they follow anything else in the bible like not lying, masturbating, looking at the other sex in a very sexual lustful way. if you do ANY of the above then you are not followeing the bible and proving how much you hate homosexuals by cherrypicking one thing in the bible you can actually do...hate homos. yeah nothing screams "christian" like calling someone a FAGGOT right?

  • I agree if you are not looking to God to set morality, then anything goes.

  • lol deRoyLight just put his video into action. Just shut up lashkaretoiba- a.k.a. the "know-it-all" we all know and hate. Good job

    Thumbs up

  • @lashkaretoiba I don't think gay rights is the issue here. deRoyLight could use evolution as the subject. What he points out is that people tend toward irrational ways of arguing. Asking a whole ton of questions lays no premise, and cannot be constructed into a valid argument. The onus is on each party to build their own case. Even if the other party is not presenting a valid argument, proving your own is the only way to prove your own.

  • Who cares if there are studies proving it's genetically caused? All you have to do is be willing to be mature enough to get to know a few gay people in the interest of being open-minded, and you find out that homosexuality in the vast majority of cases is not chosen. It would be just as unnatural for a homosexual to "repent" and forever after be attracted to the opposite sex as it would be for a heterosexual to suddenly "choose' to be attracted to the same sex! Do you think you could do that?

  • Good video! I had a cuple of laughs, and I also felt a bit more educated after watching it.

  • Bra-fucking-vo! :D

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more