untuned sc300 na-t vs. 400+rwhp evo

evo vs. sc300

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• evo
• vs
• sc300

[Datsrboi]

I hate people who ends a video so early.....

[dejacky]

we ran out of camera memory space hah!

[dejacky]

we ran out of camera memory my friend!

[super2ner]

good vid but its awhp not rwhp for the evo

[dejacky]

After dynoing the SC300, it's clear it was not making more than 320rwhp.

[Attz0r]

you ment awhp right?

[Blownpony01]

lol@evo rwhp



[4g63kevin]

@supra1216 lol there's a few evo's that are set up for drifting in the D1 GP. But the majority of people won't convert an awd to rwd. It'll make it almost cripple.

[supra1216]

@4g63kevin thank u cause iv'e never seen any rwhp evo's

[RningRiot]

@FtmfwId i call bullshit on that. 1000 whp with no tune. Even worse then bullshit, BOLLOCKS mate. Pure testicles.

[OoShinkooO]

Sorry to Bring this back from the dead, PSI, and CFM's aren't the best way to measure performance... All about the Flow (lbs/min).. Correct me if I'm wrong, but there is a direct relation to the amount of lbs/min and HP..

[4g63kevin]

awhp.

[ahmoo3839]

HAHAHA

[DVcustomZ]

where is this stock H22 running 12psi making 480whp. HONDA crap cars cannot make that power without spending 15k in motor work. We live in AUGUSTA GA bring this supposed honda

[nickp133]

i just so happen to own both cars that evo is not making 400awhp look at the sqaut in the vid or hes not on it all the way

and the sc has top end and if they kept going it might have been a different story