Thanks - I have for a long time been very sceptic to the big bang theory. Seeing thunderbolts of the goods made more sense to me than anything I've ever seen or heard about the universe. I'm just a simple accountant but my interest for cosmology has been with me since childhood and I have seen almost every documentary made on the matter. You sum it up in a very nice matter.
I was just wondering that far away stars (younger stars) could have an diferent element in composition of light it self or diferet elements composition witch light go trough , i mean imagine a younger star emiting more red than blue , will that show on light refraction bands ? is it posible stars emit more in some bands than others ?
I trully feel like astronomy is stuck somewhere , i hope they can prove neutrinos can travel faster than light so they can reformulate it all fromm bottom up.
I think, though I'm hardly a physicist, the BBT model states that all stellar bodies are moving apart, so regardless of your place in the universe, faraway objects would all appear to have a higher red shift. I guess I just don't understand the implication of quantized red shifts, and how this observation would have to place us at the center of the universe.
Make no mistake, I really do want to understand. Last week I believed that black holes were real, this week I'm questioning everything.
Thanks - I have for a long time been very sceptic to the big bang theory. Seeing thunderbolts of the goods made more sense to me than anything I've ever seen or heard about the universe. I'm just a simple accountant but my interest for cosmology has been with me since childhood and I have seen almost every documentary made on the matter. You sum it up in a very nice matter.
Again - Thank you
Dag Dietrich from Norway
sosadmin 1 month ago
Thank you, that was very interesting, you made good points.
30Frank2828 1 month ago
do you already have your thoughts published somewhere else?
if so, where.
what does it take to get work published? i have nothing else but this work.
LANN98 1 month ago in playlist More videos from suedeslounge
i knew maths was bollox at school, 2 + 2 does not add up too 5
AntonyThorburn 4 months ago
I was just wondering that far away stars (younger stars) could have an diferent element in composition of light it self or diferet elements composition witch light go trough , i mean imagine a younger star emiting more red than blue , will that show on light refraction bands ? is it posible stars emit more in some bands than others ?
I trully feel like astronomy is stuck somewhere , i hope they can prove neutrinos can travel faster than light so they can reformulate it all fromm bottom up.
TheDevineWolf 4 months ago
@GRIJZEKAK you are right they are still correct... LOL
tomsita83 5 months ago
and what about time dilation, atom bomb, sattelites using relativity, energy mass equivalence, and other things that seem to be pretty correct
GRIJZEKAK 6 months ago
you're so right about the monetary system. It perverts and it destroys creativity. it makes us learn things we don't necessarily agree with.
GRIJZEKAK 6 months ago
@tetekofa I have been looking for the answer to that question. If I find it, I'll let you know, so long as I can remember where I'm posting this.
SamtasticOnline 9 months ago
I think, though I'm hardly a physicist, the BBT model states that all stellar bodies are moving apart, so regardless of your place in the universe, faraway objects would all appear to have a higher red shift. I guess I just don't understand the implication of quantized red shifts, and how this observation would have to place us at the center of the universe.
Make no mistake, I really do want to understand. Last week I believed that black holes were real, this week I'm questioning everything.
SamtasticOnline 9 months ago