Laws of Logic 1

Laws of Logic require an invariant base.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• God
• reason
• mind
• theism
• laws
• of
• logic
• david
• berlinski
• devil's
• delusion
• philosophy
• ben
• stein
• expelled
• cri
• lord
• bible
• kora

[Goddoesexist]

(uploader) A = A and A ~~A not because of any observation in the future. Similar to Hume who said it was just habit of inducing one event from another, but we lack a basis to account for such.

One w/o omniscience lacks the ability to see the future to know for certain that events, facts, forms, norms will certainly be the same in one hour. There is no way mere men can account for A = A in a universal manner.

What is your Certain epistemic ground for the LONC as a universal?

[Goddoesexist]

God is necessary for epistemic certainty. Atheism is self-conflagrating & impossible, hence theism is certain.

For the Laws of logic that are universal, immutable, transcendent, non-tangible, atemporal cannot be the case unless God exists as universal in knowledge, immutable, transcendent, non-tangible, atemporal is the case, since the Laws of Logic must be the case (to deny this one must utilize and make a pre-commitment that the Laws of Logic as thus stated) God exists must also be the case.

[Goddoesexist]

If true moral law is it's good for the strongest to survive, let the weak grovel & die.- If there isn't a morality decreed by God, then logically the strongest should exploit and take advantage of the weak. To be a consistent atheist/evolutionist, one should close down the assistance programs & the schools for the blind, handicapped, and kill off all the weak.

God alone gives an immutable Moral Law. God surely exists.

[theboombody]

Wait a minute, I don't hold the law of non-contradiction as absolute. I've always been illogical, but that don't mean I'm always wrong. I think it just means when I'm right, I'm only right by random chance.

[Goddoesexist]

thebb

Incorrect,

You are just a self-stultifying loon who needs to seek pardon, truth, and hope.

[gejost]

@Goddoesexist You are being moronic and obviously don't know what the laws of logic are. If you have language, you basically have logic. Are you saying we don't speak because God doesn't exist?

[FUwogs]

your head is full of poop argo your head is up your ass

[Ahabite]

@Goddoesexist False dichotomy: You are assuming that those are the only two options.

You assert it, but don't prove or demonstrate it.

Everything you claim ends: ...therefore God. OR ....therefore God surely exists.

Of course, with all those religions claiming to know god, to record his wishes etc., there must be a way to see who's right.

How do we know? I guess you would suggest we just insist one is right-- which is what they all do.

I want to be nice, but you need to read another book

[Ahabite]

Your video must be ironic: you are "explaining" logic, and don't even understand it yourself.

"the laws of logic reflect the nature and mind of god"...Do they really?

What about the Law of INCLUDED Middle? That has a little role in something called Quantum Physics.

You don't take into account other systems of logic.

Are you actually saying that we can't use logic to tease out the limitations of logic...?

Uh...what?

What about what you are trying to do? Or what Kurt Godel did?

[Ahabite]

@Goddoesexist Your struggles with logic are so sad I might actually cry. Are you serious, or is this a big game?

Actually, God is not necessary. At all. For anything.

We have perfectly self-consistent systems where knowing the initial conditions and the rules by which the system iterates, is enough for epistemological certainty.

No god is necessary.

That, btw, is how a categorical claim is refuted: demonstrate a counterexample. All you need is one.

You can count that high, right?

[warren52nz]

What a load of bullshit! Good thing the ratings are disabled. I suppose you have "Comments pending approval" ticked too, typical.

Here's some Theistic "logic" for you:

"Everythng needs a beginning and a "causer" so God exists". Followed by

"God always existed and had no beginning or causer".

[zimtran007]

Burp !

[SandersonCallum]

did u voice act for stig of the dump dr bones

[lautz73]

A man cannot be his own father? Yes he can. A couple has a child, the mother dies, the father marries a much younger woman, the father dies and the son marries his fathers second wife. That would make the son his own father. But enough with that point. Most christians beleive that God and Jesus are the same thing. If that is the case then Jesus is his own father. Try getting around that without saying that Jesus isn't God like most christians claim.

[ThePeaceableKingdom]

"A" cannot be both "A" and not "A". Oh, I get it. Like light can't be both a particle and a wave, magnetism cannot be located in space and also a field, numbers on the number line cannot be both discrete and continuous... Uh oh! Wait a minute...