Crash Test 2009 - 20** Mercedes Benz GLK 220 (Full Test) EuroNcap

Details of tested car
Specifications
Tested model Mercedes Benz GLK 220 CDI, base grade, LHD
Body type 5 door SUV
Year of publication 2009
Kerb weight 1845kg
VIN from which rating applies WDC204****F450200
Class SMALL OFF-ROAD 44
Safety equipment
Front seatbelt pretensioners
Front seatbelt load limiters
Driver frontal airbag dual stage
Front passenger frontal airbag dual stage
Side body airbags
Side head airbags
Side pelvis airbag from WDC204****F450200
Driver knee airbag


Comments
Adult occupant
Mercedes Benzs PRE-SAFE system is available as an option on the GLK. The system senses when an accident is about to occur and primes the restraint and protection systems in readiness for the collision. The system was not fitted to the test cars in Euro NCAPs assessments. The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal impact, the windscreen pillar moving rearwards by only 3mm. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the knees and femurs of both driver and passenger. Mercedes were able to demonstrate that occupants of different sizes, and those sat in different seating positions, would have a similar level of protection against upper leg injuries. Cars with serial numbers greater than WDC204****F450200 are equipped as standard with a seat-mounted pelvis airbag for side impact protection and Euro NCAPs rating does not apply to earlier cars. Maximum points were scored in the side barrier test. In the more severe side pole test, protection offered by the chest was rated as marginal. Protection against whiplash injuries in a rear impact was also rated as marginal.

Child occupant
In the frontal impact, forward movement of the head of the 3 year dummy was not excessive. In the side barrier impact, the head of the 3 year and 18 month
infant were properly contained within the protective shell of the CRS. Neither dummy recorded values in the test which would reflect poor protection. Rearward facing child restraints sold by Mercedes Benz are automatically detected by the front passenger seat and the airbag for that seating position is disabled. However, other rearward facing child restraints would not be recognised by the system and the airbag remains active. The car contains a permanent label, clearly warning of the potential dangers of using a rearward facing CRS without disabling the passenger airbag.

Pedestrian
The bumper scored maximum points for the protection it offered to pedestrians' legs. However, the front edge of the bonnet was rated as poor. In most areas likely to be struck by the head of a child, the protection offered by the bonnet was poor. In those areas likely to be struck by an adult's head, the protection was predominantly good.

Safety assist
The GLK is equipped with Electronic Safety Control (ESC) as standard equipment on all variants. A seatbelt reminder system, covering both front and rear seats, is also standard equipment. A driver-set speed limitation device is standard but Mercedes did not ask for the system to be assessed by Euro NCAP.


Video Courtesy of EuroNcap

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Crash
• Test
• 2009
• 20**
• Mercedes
• Benz
• GLK
• Class
• 220
• (Full
• Test)
• EuroNcap

[alexkvaskov]

excellent crumple zone

rock on mercedes!

[girblee]

omg i cant believe that it didnt deform on the side impact:)

[R6ASSHOLE]

i need a job if you ever need a nother car test dummy....

[Annihilator1111]

the 2009-present Mercedes-Benz GLK-Class is assembled in

Bremen, Germany

6th of October City, Egypt

[LoveTheCity123]

@MusicMan0007 Actually the Volvo XC60/XC90 is the most safest SUV in THE WORLD.

[MusicMan0007]

@Quininkidink it did not almost roll over, all side impact crash tests send push the car a couple of feet. The same thing will happen with your POS XC60. GLK is rated the safest SUV.

[MusicMan0007]

@Quininkidink much better than that POS crap XC60 which is actually a Ford underneath.

[ovechkin528]

my mother has one...

[girblee]

yah but what would you rather have a volvo or a mercedes and the mercedes is lower in price!!!!!:) i would go with the mercedes and i already had a volvo and i would love to hear when ppl ask what car u drive would u rather say i drive a volvo or i drive a mercedes:) i would have the merc.

[Quininkidink]

not as good as the XC60 tho

[girblee]

but still its pretty damn good

[faillblogkeyboardcat]

where do you find these clips?