Afghanistan: The Other War LAV3Strykers Ruin Effort 1

PBS Documentary Afghanistan: The Other War reveals that the emasculation of western armies into wheeled trucks like the LAV-III/Stryker to not LOOK war-like (ie; look less capable, which they are) cannot even overcome the battle against earth terrain to have basic mobility to reach people in closed terrains in jeopardy at the hands of sub-national groups rebelling against the nation-state. You look less capable means you ARE less capable and being weak with a "glass jaw" neither protects the good civilians nor engenders respect from the enemy. "Nation-building" in war zones in wheeled trucks is a disaster.

Also telling is the British Multi-National Force Commander's obsession with self; who cares how history will judge him? The Mission and the Men should come before "Me". By being in road-bound wheeled trucks, the NATO MN forces have a "glass jaw" that makes it impossible to "turn- the-other-cheek" so they are trigger-happy trying to use firepower to compensate for a lack of M113 Gavin-type tracked cross-country mobility (avoid road troubles in first place) and armored protection. When NATO forces are caught red-handed needlessly killing Afghan civilians, as a Cover-Your-Ass (CYA) politician--maybe without a technotactical grasp of what his subordinates are doing--he gives the standard c'est la guerre (it is war, blame it not our incompetence or willful wrong-doing) excuses sure to infuriate the people whom we want to stay out of the Taliban's camp. He offers that the Soldiers might be court-martialed but he doesn't show any grasp that he has them in bad situations setting them up for such failures; for example they live in exposed tents when they should be in dug-in and Hesco-covered ISO shipping container "BATTLEBOXes" at their forward operating bases (FOBs).

http://www.geocities.com/strategicmaneuver/battleboxes.htm

Hopefully, he and others will watch this PBS video and realize they need to hand out bright-orange traffic cones or saw horses so his troops can start actually visibly marking impromptu road blocks (place a sign on one of the cones/saw horses saying "STOP!" in the local language) at THE PROPER DISTANCE TO GIVE CAR BOMB STAND-OFF PROTECTION and stop the gleeful "warning shot" BS which lets cars/trucks get too close in the first place and results in needless dead/wounded innocent civilians. Or do we want an excuse to open fire and kill "ragheads"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAJ46Wosrn0

...confirming we are just there to take their oil/natural resources:

http://www.combatreform.com/militarismsucks.htm

...or do we want to do what's morally RIGHT and technotactically BEST to protect our troops and avoid misunderstandings that kill innocent civilians and feed the rebellion? For all the $$$ millions going into sexy helicopters to fly him around, surely he can afford some traffic cones/saw horses? Or some spark plugs? (see part 2). Watching the PBS video may not make these lessons obvious; maybe he and other decision-makers will read our captions here and follow the lead of the British and Dutch and re-equip ALL NATO forces with M113 Gavin or other type light tracks since Afghanistan's terrain is traversable by these low ground-pressure vehicles and not wheeled trucks with any armor protection.

http://www.geocities.com/wheelsvstracks

The Canadians to their credit, have since this video factored in their constant LAV3Stryker truck failures in Afghanistan and turned more and more to tracked vehicles.

Its clear that to do SASO/COIN operations properly, we need a dedicated non-linear, battlefield stability corps composed of older, more mature, psychologically-screened to not be narcissist "shooters" properly equipped with light M113 Gavin armored tracks, affordable 2-seat observation/attack fixed-wing STOL aircraft to scour the skies 24/7/365 and not constantly crash like UAVs do and see hiding enemies with human eyesight plus sensorary help---and plenty of combat engineers to repair the country's infrastructure and separation wall apart warring factions and security fence trouble-makers out.

http://www.combatreform2.com/johnpaulvann.htm

No one has to be a victim of something in order to condemn it. Do you have to take LSD to know its wrong?

No.

Do you have to be a military victim overseas to know its wrong to occupy countries that do not belong to you?

No.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• LAV-III
• Strykers
• COIN
• afghanistan
• land
• mines
• casualties
• trucks
• military
• incompetence
• SASO
• stability
• support
• operations
• heart
• minds
• counter-insurgency

[GumiesFromForks98331]

hey nomorenarcissism do you expect any viehical to go strait up the side of a hill with bolders all around it?

[nomorenarcissism]

YES, tracks can do it and anyone who has been in LIGHT tracks in desert-mountainous terrain has done it.

[napal05]

USA is fully responsible for the rise of taliban movement. So go and wash you shame away with your blood!

[nomorenarcissism]

Sadly correct. The MICC-TT needs a bogie man to justify war profits building wheeled junk and UAVs etc.

[Blacksmith1964]

Funny how the film tries so hard to make the Canadian and other Nato troops into the bad guys. Yet it fails utterly.

Too bad for you guys, even the Taliban knows who the good guys are, and it's not them!

[str8up87]

well thats teh reality of the media all you see is the roadside bombs why becuase its more dramatic to the public, i'm in the army and been quite a few firefights and ambushes...i'm pretty sure our firefights is just the same as world war 2, war is war,the reality of the beast kill or be killed, it brings the worst out of humanity and the best out of men. men well jump on grenades for you,men will rape and kill children..thats the reality of war...the beast.

[mckennap87]

No surrender to the militant islam, british froces all the way, royal marines and airbourne forces.

[vanPoll]

Totally agree to that.

[nomorenarcissism]

If you are referring to me, the video owner, no I violently oppose fascism especially the AmeroFascism running rampant these days in the U.S. that wants to kill "ragheads" for 9/11 when RAGHEADS DIDN'T DO 9/11.

[nomorenarcissism]

Why we need the AFGHAN Army to do the majority of their own self-defense since they can differentiate who is who.

[nomorenarcissism]

We are murdering innocent civilians because we want to use too fast fighter-bombers and UAVs and refuse to close the border off with a sensor-security fence wanting instead to ride around in wheeled trucks and sit in outposts to gunsling.

[nomorenarcissism]

Simplistic and false. At least in WW2 if we were getting constantly blown up on roads by land mines because we are in high ground-pressure wheeled trucks, they'd switch to tracks. There was INTERNAL constructive criticism; today the BS we fed for EXTERNAL consumption is believed internally; comments like yours for example glossing over details.

[ktm511]

We are the Bad Guys????? Hows that?