Stoopidfast RSX

750+whp dyno

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• stoopidfast
• st00pidfast
• stoopid-fast
• rsx
• turbo

[BattleAxWarior]

well as a fan of the rsx even tho mine is a base model....it takes a sc to even make the cobalt semi quick and a turbo also for the neon....take them off both cars and try to even keep up with and n/a rsx....it will never happen ecotec can suck it even if it is "decent" 2.0 barely makes 150hp....weak

[jnffinest]

my honda puts out 140hp and on a windy day add 10 more bit*hes!

[shaundiedrinksdew]

even if your cobalt and neons have a bit of an edge, its only because of forced induction, you guys have nothing to brag about in your srt 4's because your 2.4 tc can barely pull on a n/a 2.0.

[TheVinnythepooh]

Biggest difference between the rsx type s, cobalt ss, and srt-4 is that stock the cobalt and srt-4 will beat the stock rsx-s in 0-60 (torquey) but the rsx-s will beat them both from a 60 roll.

[gt2k4srt4]

@BattleAxWarior You are worried about to motors that was built around a FI setup. lol and now you think taking them away will be a great comparison. Just wow. I am sure if Dodge or Chevy wanted there 4 cyclinders to be NA they would have raise the compression like the honda's and acura. Apples and oranges my friend.

[andrew1501]

@BattleAxWarior honestly i'd say you are being generous with those figures. you have to remember that the srt-4's and cobalts are setup with a lower compression for the FI. i'd say their power would be even less than that. I love the type-s, however the cam really only sets it up for horsepower, it lacks torque.

[maxinator39]

@TheVinnythepooh

On slicks it beat a stock corvette and ran a shit time.

[BattleAxWarior]

@Marshmallowrex you said it not me :) dont get all but hurt....its only youtube. You can lol at me all you want, i could care less, Thanks have a nice day

[BattleAxWarior]

@Marshmallowrex ok whatever you say......read my comment again there smart ass. Eco-tec's and neons without their turbo and super charger have 130-140hp if they are lucky lol. RSX-s on the other hand is 200hp with no forced induction. You are a tool for even making a comment like that, all you did was point out the obvious....so you are the dumbass. But im sure whatever you have my n/a Lexus IS300 2jz would whoop on whatever you drive.... 300+hp to the rear wheels and no turbo needed. Try again

[LivingSuSpence]

I just flagged this video for sexual content. HOO YEAH

[transaman98]

@BattleAxWarior Well I suppose it is a good thing that a driver isn't limited to naturally aspirated motor. :Honda has been in the tuner performance world for years. For the most part domestic performance 4 cylinders haven't had much of a market. So in turn it hasn't had time to develop on the performance side of things like its far east competitors. Give it time. In the mean time it is still easy to do those numbers in a vehicle that has more displacement and a turbo... and it will last!

[byteddie]

Where is this place at..i have heard of it before but never knew where it was at..i wanna take it there ^-^