Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Debunked! - What the Bleep Do We Know?

Episode 1 of Debunked! takes a look at "What the Bleep Do We Know" (2004), a film that mixes quantum mysticism with pure crap. Many thanks to articles from Salon, Skeptic, and Washington Post, and...  
 
Customize

More From: williamdebunker

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
This is a video response to Debunking Quantum Mind
140 ratings
Sign in to rate
5,044 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (176)   Options

Loading...
jonopinkfloyd (8 hours ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
As I am a huge fan of your work, I find it in complete lack of taste that those that do not agree with your commentary, resort to insults. Bad form. Oh well for a civil debate! I look forward to another installment in the debunking series, and I can't thank you enough for helping me actually make timbres of my own on a F*&king DX-7!!!!! Keep up all your work!!!!
Cheers,
Jon.
jennyamelie (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Thank you for a well researched and engaging debunking of some of the major problems in the movie.
Nostradamis (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
The music was good!
Infinitevoyager (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
Have you ever tried proving anything to yourself or just like making ignorant accusation? But without complete and utter fools like you, what would there be to compare a greater mind to. People like you care about nothing other than feeding off of their own oversized ego. They're bottom feeders. No judgment, just pure observation.
williamdebunker (1 week ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Beyond articles from Salon, Skeptic, and Washington Post, I looked through the court case, interviews with Jeff Knight and JZ Knight's former body guard, and hundreds of statements from former members, some of whom had to be essentially deprogrammed after following JZ Knight for years.

Is there a specific claim that you're having difficulty accepting? You might find it fun to call people morons, bottom feeders, and utter fools, but that really doesn't progress your argument.
williamdebunker (1 week ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I certainly don't think that JZ Knight or her channeling has realized truth, so I certainly won't prostrate myself before her, and certainly will not serve her.

What I do know is that her organization is under investigation, that she was sued for her actions during the court case "Knight v Knight" (which ended with her husbands death), and that she has become increasingly paranoid over the years, and her compound guards are now armed.

This kind of thing usually doesn't end well.
pavanatanaya (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -1
Marked as spam
I am certainly not a devotee.
I am unfamiliar with her legal situation and I dont have an intrest in the outcome.
I have seen a defensive shift in her energy over the years but I chalked it up to my shifting and not hers, Either way , the dharma is what it is. If they flame out,as she would say, SoBeit. The followers are on their path as well. If they refuse to question her, they seal their own fate. Everything ends. The quality of that ending is simply divine providence. Namaste.
Infinitevoyager (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
It is only a fool who argues issues he knows nothing of. And you moron, are about the most ignorant person I have encountered from the thousands of video comments I've seen.. I don't see how your accusations can keep you away from lawsuits. Jeff Knight's death had nothing to do with any court case. You are so full of shit I can smell you here. But it is ok, because what goes around comes around. You spend all of your time making false and misleading accusations you know fuck all about.
williamdebunker (1 week ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
Jeff's side during the Knight v. Knight case brought up how they felt JZ Knight's channeling was fraud. The case ended with Jeff's death, as they couldn't really proceed.

You can find "Knight v. Knight", as it's a public document. There's also a fascinating interview with Glen Cunningham that's available on-line, who is Ramtha's former bodyguard. He discusses changes in JZ Knights behavior over the years, particularly her increasing paranoia.
williamdebunker (5 days ago) Show Hide
Marked as spam
I should correct one thing there - the *case* ended with the jury siding with JZ Knight. The *appeal* couldn't go foward with Jeff's death.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.