Upload

Debunked! - What the Bleep Do We Know?

williamdebunker williamdebunker·1 video
282
73,353
Like     Dislike 213

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like williamdebunker's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike williamdebunker's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add williamdebunker's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Apr 10, 2009

Episode 1 of Debunked! takes a look at "What the Bleep Do We Know" (2004), a film that mixes quantum mysticism with pure crap.

Many thanks to articles from Salon, Skeptic, and Washington Post, and Bob Park's "Voodoo Science".

Emoto:
---------
Journal of Scientific Exploration. 4 22: 481--493. 2008.

http://www.is-masaru-emoto-for-real.com/

Meditation Experiment:
------------------------------

Crime Statistics in Washington, D.C.
http://mpdc.dc.gov/mpdc/cwp/view,a,12...,|.asp

Click http://tinyurl.com/epkms (the above link gets cropped by YouTube)

Park, Robert, ''Voodoo Science"', Oxford University Press


Overall Attitude of Physicists Regarding Film:
----------------------------------------­-------------------

You can find hundreds of individual blogs, letters, and postings by physicists responding to the film. Too many to list here, but the article below provides an overall look.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/200...

  • Category

  • License

    Standard YouTube License

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Top Comments

  • ComplyMusic

    I find this video was very biased. I don't like name calling when i watch something. It shows immaturity to new ideas. I don't believe in anything but i am open to ideas.

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ComplyMusic's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ComplyMusic's comment.
  • 1Viqing

    ~ Philosophers and Scientists to consider a new perspective. As a result, like in all of history, there's two nut-wings that emerge: the nutters behind documentaries like this, and the nutters that utterly and completely dismiss any but the Aristotelian view (I'm not up to date on organization names, but in Norway we have one called Skepsis, and I don't remember the rest of the names I've heard before.. CSICOP, Randi's foundation, etc).

    Basically the fundamentalist opposing parties.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.
    in reply to williamdebunker (Show the comment)

Video Responses

This video is a response to Debunking Quantum Mind

All Comments (1,830)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • Indagatoroculi

    lol CampitelliBoxing quantum physics is true , perhaps you could provide a reference ?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Indagatoroculi's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Indagatoroculi's comment.
  • CampitelliBoxing

    and for example before quantum physics had been proved true, too many scientist said that quantum physics was an absurd

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CampitelliBoxing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CampitelliBoxing's comment.
    in reply to williamdebunker (Show the comment)
  • CampitelliBoxing

    yes they mixed quantum physics with all that spirituality and thats wrong

    BUT, the emoto experiments are not been refuted and your behavior is against the science my friend, the science is the search for the truth, and you (as many scientist do too) are trapped by dogmatism

    there are many people who have tried the emoto rice experiment, search it in google, and that people uses the SCIENCE METHOD which is the empirical test to test an hypothesis

    (sorry my bad english)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CampitelliBoxing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate CampitelliBoxing's comment.
    in reply to williamdebunker (Show the comment)
  • 1Viqing

    Also, if you're not aware of the alternative model for particles; waves. Look up "wave particle dualism" to see the modern (Quantum Physics) understanding on the issue. Wave Function collapse is also interesting to look into.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.
    in reply to openyourmind888 (Show the comment)
  • 1Viqing

    They have energy, but no mass. You can easily measure them, but destroy them in the process (since they're only energy).

    They're not "nothing" or "empty space", it's just highly debatable what they are. Gravitons (responsible for gravity), for example, are pure hypotheticals. They haven't been found in particle-form, only in the form of force, and they're only assumed to be particles by particle-Physicists (and the-like).

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.
    in reply to openyourmind888 (Show the comment)
  • 1Viqing

    Some of the more extreme views, yes. But the Quantum Physics most certainly has made Science re-consider its previous Aristotelian view of Physics & of reality. Many Quantum Physicists have more mystical interpretation of reality than others working in science, or normal people with a "Naive Realistic" interpretation of the world. Read for example Wikipedia/Quantum_Mechanics#Ph­ilosophical_implications

    It has opened everyone's minds a bit (except the stubborn & close-minded), and forced ~

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 1Viqing's comment.
    in reply to williamdebunker (Show the comment)
  • unopeneddoor

    Bullshit. What is real is real.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate unopeneddoor's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate unopeneddoor's comment.
    in reply to PB ThreeZero (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later