Climate Change --- Global Dimming

BBC programme on Climate Change, interesting and informative

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• BBC
• climate
• change
• global
• dimming

[pegobuilders]

Being sceptical about climate change is not unreasonable, doing nothing about it is reckless

[Geo24ify]

What it says is that that global dimming refers to the climate cooling. It does not deny that the global warming is occurring. It is simply stating it is hiding the real warmth because of this cooling process. Pollution in our atmosphere reflect a greater majority of the incoming solar radiation. If we get rid of the pollution the earth will heat up to a greater extent. That's what this video is saying. Through global dimming we are not seeing the real warming of the earth.

[JonThm]

Green plants metabolise carbon dioxide. No rise of low level of this gas in the air is possible

[MoodyBlueCDN]

The only thing causing Global dimming around here is the chronic haze being created via CHEMTRAILS! The video is actually funny in parts as it shows jets leaving what they call contrails when in fact they are clearly chemtrails. Notice also in some of the shots, the sky shows lines of chemtrail activity. What a "Global warming" hoax! If clouds cause act like a blanket to keep the earth warm at night, then what do you supposed all those man made clouds do at night? You can't have it both ways!

[georgenorthwood]

The BBC have bigged up Global warming to such an extent that energy costs have trebled in just a few years, are they working for the energy companies to give them an excuse to put up prices!!! And just like petrol the price always goes up but never comes down and of course the Government gets it's cut and the people of Britain suffer especially the elderly.

Remember pictures of empty reservoirs, no water, the climate hotter than Spain etc etc etc!!!

[mmurphy550]

xchopp, How old are you?

[xchopp]

@13andincradiblycutt I repeat: 97% of credible scientists think that the +ve radiative forcing of CO2, CH4, CFCs, HFCs and other man-made gases is enough to overwhelm the -ve forcing from aerosols and clouds, although the latter is far from negligible (the subject of the documentary). If that is not enough for you, well, then what would be? You are the one lacking in skepticism; you are the one who has to justify their position here. P.S. The word logic does not require scare quotes.

[13andincradiblycutt]

@xchopp You MUST be a scientist if you are saying Dr. Bryson is wrong according to your "logic". So what peer reviewed paper did you write so I can look it up? Or are you just using your own judgement and basing conclusions based on what you've read? Are you "qualified" to reach your own conclusions?

[xchopp]

@13andincradiblycutt You do not know that I am not a scientist -- but you should know that 97% of credible living qualified and active scientists (those who are performing research and publishing in peer-reviewed science journals) disagree with you and the late Dr. Bryson. Did you watch the documentary?

[13andincradiblycutt]

@xchopp Well since you're not a scientist you can't tell me that Dr. Reid Bryson is wrong, so I guess he's right. Oh wait, that was YOUR idiotic argument.

[xchopp]

@13andincradiblycutt I can tell you that 97% of scientists think that the +ve radiative forcing of CO2, CH4, CFCs, HFCs and other man-made gases is enough to overwhelm the -ve forcing from aerosols and clouds, although the latter is far from negligible (the subject of the documentary). If that is not enough for you, well, then what would be?