9/11 Mysteries - [Full Length]

90 minutes of evidence and analysis, filled with eyewitness testimonials. Point-by-point review of the official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to vanish in seconds?

No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and the questions.

http://www.infowars.com/resources.html

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• truth
• conspiracy
• tenth
• anniversary
• 10
• years
• bbc
• report
• new
• show
• US
• UK
• terrorism
• event
• crisis
• attack
• bomb
• hijackers
• september
• 11th
• building
• news
• tower
• world
• twin
• towers
• inside
• job
• george
• bush
• media
• iraq
• WMD
• lies
• roadtrip
• debunk
• official
• story
• investigation
• protest
• USA
• laws
• patriot
• act
• rights
• freedom
• government
• control
• 1984
• terrorstorm
• false
• flag
• invasion
• wars
• destruction
• order
• alex
• jones
• illuminati
• people
• psy-op
• operations
• july
• fox
• new world
• files

[sanluisskywatch]

So, I had mirrored this video- but I was told that I had a Copyright Strike registered by 9/11 Eye Witness- Seems like you didn't get the same strike.. wonder why that was?

Anyway, who is 9/11 Eye Witness, and why are they being so fucking retarded?

[GoodFightUploads]

@sanluisskywatch Not sure, but yeah some people are very retarded when it comes to Copyright.

[buff24seven]

great documentary very well directed.

[KPJ113]

I ask, rhetorically - why did they have to use volcanos as examples of what smoke from a pryoclastic surge looks like, when (based on their theory), they could have done a split screen with any number of *actual buildings* that were taken down by controlled demolition?

And, the top floors of the first tower that were above where the plane struck, toppled (vs. imploded). It was the floors beneath where the impact was that fell floor on top of floor.

[dreadnaught2]

@Gilraen777 ...it puzzles you because you lack the information or ability to understand why it collapsed. Nothing fell into its footprint. Buildings that were blocks away were damaged by the fallen debri. Get a clue son

[Gilraen777]

this points out some things about the World Trade Center collapse that has always puzzled me, like why did it fall neatly into it's "footprint" and look like a controlled demolition? (Because it was?) Or why if the fires were so high up, why did the bottoms collapse? And I thought this thing was built to withstand exactly what happened, so WTF? Thanks for the eye-opener.

[dreadnaught2]

@FreedumbFighter28 ...enjoy pretending that FDNY backs up anything that 9-11 truth says about controlled demolition. Peer reviewed means that something is confirmed by an outside source, not another troofer kook.

[futhermucker1]

Damn brother! Well done sir. I don't know who or where you got it from, but the fact that you took the time to share it says alot about you. Thanks for sharing bro. I will share this. TC!

[FreedumbFighter28]

@dreadnaught2 Uhm....we do have peer reviewed papers, we did win some cases in court, and we work with FDNY who were in the towers. Are ALL of you debunkerscum required to take a class where you learn how to FAIL and misrepresent the facts? Sure seems like it....or do you all live your lives in a box where facts and truth never enter??....HAHAHAHAHA...XD now dance the monkey dance of shame for the class

[dreadnaught2]

9-11 truth has all of this "amazing" evidence but can't seem to get a day in court or publish anything that passes peer review or stands up to the scientific method of review. 9-11 truth is nonsense. FDNY would throw truthers off of tall buildings if it was allowed.