Cancer is Fungus 2 of 2

Dr. Tung - Who found the cure for ulcers? One man, who rejected the common ideology of the medical industry. It wasn't through endless clinical trials. He tried his theory ON HIMSELF. Humanity enjoys the benefit of his vision. I was impressed that Simoncini gives the credit for his discovery to God Almighty. God answers prayer. I wouldn't blow this off. Who do you trust?

Doctor Tung.
If this Doctor have killd anyone why is he not in jail yet,specially when it's not proven in puplic this soda.And you say there have bin sevel people who have died from it .Strange.
Don't you think that it's a serious accusation.
Were did you get this from.

Where are the clinical studies? There has to be some sort of paper published on this, can anyone point it out to me?

There are no papers...this guy does not even practice research. That fungus causes cancer is simply a theory of his that is yet to be backed by experimental fact. If anti-fungal medication could actually cure cancer, do you not think that the pharmaceutical industry would be all over this in a flash? The reason they are not is that it is simply not based on fact. This thing is dangerous in that it may divert cancer sufferers away from treatments that have actually been proven to help

The reason that the pharmaceutical industry is NOT jumping on it is because you can't patent baking soda, you can't market it properly. If something like baking soda becomes a common treatment that produces results - imagine how much money will be lost to the mainstream industry. The pharmaceutical industy will not let this happen. They will sponsor research to "prove" that baking soda does not work. Their primary goal is not to cure anyone (they will go out of business if they find a cure).

Research alkalinity vs. acidity and ph balance. You'll find a lot of information on this. All un-patentable

Still no evidence. You have lots of opinion, but no reason to believe it. Anti-scientific thinking is a plague in America, and frankly a public danger when it concerns serious topics like cancer. If we turn away from fact and knowledge, what's left is superstition, and wishful thinking.

Let's have a citation.

Well, I'm not an MD, so no worry. Also, have you looked at the mortality statistics without standard treatment? It is patently absurb to blame doctors for the effects of diseases. It's like blaming them for deaths in a car accident. Also, my point is not to promote chemo, but to promote using FACT as the basis for deciding between treatments. I ask you: what facts favor sodium bicarb (success rate 0%) over other treatments?

This message board is very strange. So many people speaking with confidence about things for which there is no evidence. Did you know that this former MD was convicted of manslaughter? He injected sodium bicarb into patients who died immediately as a result. Yes, this killed their cancer, but it also killed them. Why are we so quick to trust salesmen (with an MD) who is selling a completely unproven "natural" solution, but so skeptical of treatments purely because they are mainstream?