YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

NASA Puffin Low Noise, Electric VTOL Personal Air Vehicle

NASAPAV NASAPAV·16 videos
778
1,235,925
Like     Dislike 34

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like NASAPAV's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike NASAPAV's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add NASAPAV's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Nov 11, 2009

Conceptual design focusing on the ability of a redundant electric propulsion system to provide new capabilities for Vertical Takeoff and Landing aircraft. Specifically utilizing electric motor variable rpm to accomplish a low tipspeed prop-rotor (400 ft/sec tip speed at hover and 200 ft/sec at cruise) to accomplish an order of magnitude reduction in community noise for close proximity operations (30-40 db reduction). The variable rpm capability also achieves a 25% improvement in prop-rotor efficiency through operation at optimal advance ratios.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (NASAPAV)

  • manofsan

    I've seen a number of small turbofan projects on Youtube. If you do a search for "RC turbofan" you'll find various videos.

    Have you considered that a pair of small gas-powered turboprops or turbofans could work well for the Puffin concept? At least they'd have a higher power-to-weight ratio than electric motors with batteries.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate manofsan's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate manofsan's comment.
  • NASAPAV

    No you really don't want to attempt to apply JetCat or other small turbines - it would be a terrible match up. The fuel consumption on these small turbines is terrible, the reliability is terrible, the required gear reduction would be huge and the gear box weight would be large. The better idea, which we are looking at is the use of a small turbine to directly spin an alternator at very high rpm (so the alternator is very light), and for that electricity to then directly power the prop motor

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.
    in reply to manofsan (Show the comment)
  • NASAPAV

    By doing this, the battery weight could be made very small as only a backup short duration source. Essentially the turbine/alternator becomse a very light 'battery', even when you account for the fuel weight. We are specifically looking at applying a new turbine/alternator developed for DARPA that can burn heavy fuel (bio-fuel) and use a recuperator to increase the efficiency. But small turbines have a long way to go - I'm anxious to apply them if we get them working, but in the right way

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.
    in reply to NASAPAV (Show the comment)
  • manofsan

    I see - but isn't that 2 conversion steps instead of one? Fuel --> Electricity --> Mechanical

    What about small Wankel rotary engines? Those tend to have pretty decent power-to-weight ratios.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate manofsan's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate manofsan's comment.
    in reply to NASAPAV (Show the comment)
  • NASAPAV

    Yes, and going to electric has at least 5% penalties in each direction with even the best advanced electric motors. But that is still better than attempting to have these small turbines directly turn a low rpm shaft. You realize the differential in rpm is at least 40x?  What do you do to throttle - these little turbines can't perform well off the one design point. By connecting to a high speed alternator you can optimize for running at a single speed efficiently and reliably.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.
    in reply to manofsan (Show the comment)
  • NASAPAV

    Now for rotaries - ugh. Have you run one? I have for UAV projects - small rotaries are almost as much of a pain in the ass as small turbines. They drink fuel, make a crap load of noise, have a glowing red hot exhaust, and have seal maintenance problems. They spin at crazy high rpm 10 to 15K that require a gearbox. Yes,the gearbox is easier on a rotary because the gears are only being beaten up by the prop instead of both the prop and recip engine with intermittent loads.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.
    in reply to NASAPAV (Show the comment)

Top Comments

  • NASAPAV

    Really? Do you know what the Lift/Drag ratio is for a helicopter? Between 4 and 5 - incredibly inefficient devices. Do you know what the L/D of this aircraft is? At 100 mph it's 17.5, at 150 mph it's 14.5. So about 4x the aerodynamic efficiency. Do you know how complex a helicopter rotor is and why heli's are so expensive? The hub mechanism on this is incredibly simple and low cost. Sorry, not quite...

    · 16

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate NASAPAV's comment.
    in reply to ginofrater (Show the comment)
  • LWJCarroll

    I suspect thatg during flight face down, holding your head up will cause a fatigue problem (sore neck) , hence a recumbent position for the pilot would be better.??...Laurie

    · 6

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LWJCarroll's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate LWJCarroll's comment.

Video Responses


All Comments (609)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • DeathofaGasGuzzler

    I want one of these! ;)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DeathofaGasGuzzler's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate DeathofaGasGuzzler's comment.
  • vladimirpanovru

    Шея будет болеть!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vladimirpanovru's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate vladimirpanovru's comment.
  • projectdelta50

    Now how the fuck do you get out of it

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate projectdelta50's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate projectdelta50's comment.
  • bruzote

    The pilot had better hope the A/C and defogger systems don't malfunction. That flying bed with a sunroof would overheat people rather quickly on a sunny day.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bruzote's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate bruzote's comment.
  • 7013032

    I can imagine count Dracula flying this thing :D

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 7013032's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate 7013032's comment.
    in reply to Illus Wing (Show the comment)
  • Illus Wing

    flying coffin

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Illus Wing's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Illus Wing's comment.
  • galipblj06

    Deffinately a bad idea for civilian use. The crashes would be baaad

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate galipblj06's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate galipblj06's comment.
  • Stefano La Commare

    That there is one hell of a claustrophobic, uncomfortable ride...

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Stefano La Commare's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Stefano La Commare's comment.
  • Edjean Dorvil

    Dear Santa,

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Edjean Dorvil's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Edjean Dorvil's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later