This video totally makes sense if you're in a think tank funded by the military industrial complex. Or if you regularly have cocaine fueled sex orgies and warship lucifer. Go f*ck yourself CIA. No one buys this counter-intelligence operation. You want to have an honest days work? Have a one-time interview with Jeff Rense, and take what you have coming to you.
@EricHollerbach Dude, you completely stole my thunder. I was *trying* to articulate the message behind this fool's video. Not one word from Steven Jones was actually used, nor did he sight his "reputable research journals." The logic this idiot attempts to pursue is disturbing--at best.
@ItWasDEWed It's becoming common knowledge that mini-nukes were used to "save the free world from 'a WORSE disaster'"; the FBI has apparently admitted this to inside Russian scientists.
Naturally, it's hard to verify the veracity of ANYTHING, except that the original 911 story is the WORST 'conspiracy theory' out there.
It is even likely that Jones was involved int the development of the weapon that was used on 9/11. Someone has a video where Jones denies involvement with it -- and he wasn't even asked that question.
Let me get this right... Steven Jones took a grant from The Department of Energy in the 1980's to study cold fusion. Here he covered up the truth that cold fusion is real. Therefore, when he talks about 9-11 and how the government covered up the demolition of the towers... his information is suspect?? There is no conflict of interest if he took a grant from the government, then accuses the government of covering up 9-11 truth.
This video totally makes sense if you're in a think tank funded by the military industrial complex. Or if you regularly have cocaine fueled sex orgies and warship lucifer. Go f*ck yourself CIA. No one buys this counter-intelligence operation. You want to have an honest days work? Have a one-time interview with Jeff Rense, and take what you have coming to you.
EricHollerbach 8 months ago
@EricHollerbach Dude, you completely stole my thunder. I was *trying* to articulate the message behind this fool's video. Not one word from Steven Jones was actually used, nor did he sight his "reputable research journals." The logic this idiot attempts to pursue is disturbing--at best.
TruthMyMamaToldMe 8 months ago
@ItWasDEWed It's becoming common knowledge that mini-nukes were used to "save the free world from 'a WORSE disaster'"; the FBI has apparently admitted this to inside Russian scientists.
Naturally, it's hard to verify the veracity of ANYTHING, except that the original 911 story is the WORST 'conspiracy theory' out there.
UnoRaza 1 year ago
this is utter bollocks.You have to feel pity for the makers of this.
stratocaster539 1 year ago
It is even likely that Jones was involved int the development of the weapon that was used on 9/11. Someone has a video where Jones denies involvement with it -- and he wasn't even asked that question.
ItWasDEWed 1 year ago
The common theme is that Steven Jones covers up free energy. It was free-energy technology that was used on 9/11. THAT is what he is covering up.
Almost everyone knows that the official story of 9/11 is bogus. So, if they are given another bogus story it still keeps the truth hidden.
ItWasDEWed 1 year ago
It wouldn't even matter....who cares.
911 was an inside job! Period!
...............The People will prevail!
REALNEWSTUCSON 2 years ago
Let me get this right... Steven Jones took a grant from The Department of Energy in the 1980's to study cold fusion. Here he covered up the truth that cold fusion is real. Therefore, when he talks about 9-11 and how the government covered up the demolition of the towers... his information is suspect?? There is no conflict of interest if he took a grant from the government, then accuses the government of covering up 9-11 truth.
EricHollerbach 2 years ago