South Tower Anomalies III - Addressing the Debunkers

An analysis of video anomalies in network coverage of 9/11. This movie does NOT try to prove NPT (no-planes theory), only fake news.

Update - archive.org put the 9/11 archive back online - with some changes. Now the Chopper 4 shot shows what looks like a very small plane following the "orb" path. If you have the original live NBC shot on video in high quality, please post it!


Please see the blog "Of News and Planes":
http://www.dayjoborchestra.com/djo-blogs.htm

http://www.dayjoborchestra.com

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• south
• tower
• wtc
• plane
• fake
• news
• video
• anomalies
• nbc
• 911
• editing
• altering
• inside
• job
• dayjob
• orchestra
• dayjoborchestra

[Gavinanimator]

Last time I saw video 2 there was a plane going by. Why isn't there a plane in your video?

[ThoughtCrime7]

@Gavinanimator I think you need to watch again.

[RichVehicle]

OMG!!! You can't see the windows on either shot so both buildings are fakes!!!

: )

Just kidding.

Basically before you can throw around vague hypotheses based on video evidence you might need to familiarise yourself with everything from parallax to depth of field to the NTSC colour carrier, fields, compression artefacts, pixel binning, atmospheric aberration (etc etc).

In other words the video shows nothing.

[ThoughtCrime7]

@RichVehicle You gave me a list of video terms - great - with no specific argument. In other words, your comment shows nothing.

[RichVehicle]

@ThoughtCrime7

My point is that without even a grounding in the technical basics and you are just guessing your way through all this.

[ThoughtCrime7]

@RichVehicle Guessing? I created my own 3D models to test the theories so I wouldn't have to guess. I made a video - you made a comment. If you have a specific criticism, let's hear it.

[machfron]

A masterpiece.

[MrPolitischUnkorrekt]

verry interesting work.

thank you

[kansasinnovember]

TOP TWO 911 "OFFICIAL" LIES

1) Planes hit the towers

2) Almost 3000 people died

[ctcole77]

TOP FIVE 911 TWOOFER LIES

1) Nanothermite (aka paint chips from PPG)

2) No flight 93 (despite 95% of plane debris recovered)

3) No flight 77 (even though over 130 witnesses saw a plane)

4) Marvin Bush WTC security (never happened)

5) Free fall speed (absolutely no building collapsed at freefall speed)

[megamogx]

/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o

/watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k

/watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI

/watch?v=WxqoChniKVU

/watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4

/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY

/watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE

/watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w

/watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ

/watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA

[evil001987]

FEST HOS MANGE!!!!!! /watch?v=xoVRPngoLHM

[Dendude222]

@Richvehicle- Hi, how's life in shillville? Stop performing ATM on Bush for a second and riddle me this. How is it then that the live feed can somehow miss the jet but still manage to capture the much smaller boats on the water that are much further away? Got an answer for that asshole?

[anthonyc31]

AWESOME VIDEO. The reason that debunkers (i.e. disinfo agent scumbags) fight the "no plane" explanation tooth and nail is because IT'S TRUE. The disinfo scum fighting the "no plane" truth are willing to concede all other points about 911 to appear like they are "911 truthers", but they cannot and will not concede this last point because it's central to their fraud. No planes = no hijackers. They need hijackers to justify the wars ...

[lunartraveler]

@stbays You are exactly right. Most of the so-called "anomalies" people point to in these videos are due to compression artifacts, or perspective distortion.

[Jordrake44]

Definitely food for thought, and well composed evidence. Something fishy appears to have gone on, but you are right not to have guessed at it.