Matthews and WSJ's bias is blatant to any informed viewer/reader. He emphasizes her support of the bridge then slips modifiers "once" and "initially" to make it technically correct but leaving the audience with an incorrect impression. Palin's statements are 100% correct and factual. In 2007 she did a complete 180 and cancelled the Gravina Island Bridge project. So, in the long run (and when it mattered), she said "thanks but no thanks."
This is one dumb Hillbillie supported chic.
truesincerity757 1 year ago
yeah comparini BUT she did cancel HER OWN BRIDGE
mariscalmovies 2 years ago
Matthews and WSJ's bias is blatant to any informed viewer/reader. He emphasizes her support of the bridge then slips modifiers "once" and "initially" to make it technically correct but leaving the audience with an incorrect impression. Palin's statements are 100% correct and factual. In 2007 she did a complete 180 and cancelled the Gravina Island Bridge project. So, in the long run (and when it mattered), she said "thanks but no thanks."
comparini3000 3 years ago
Don't confuse the issues with facts! ;-)
chessdad3 3 years ago