MK Davis/PGF - Patty's Baby Bigfoot? A Visual Analysis
Uploader Comments (PostToastie)
Top Comments
-
I'm in the same position as you are.
I have photo's. As a matter of fact, about 13 photo's and 2 video's.
But alot of people don't have the mind-set to piece them together, or to figure out what is in the captures.
I even showed them to a bfro investigator. Now I understand why the BFRO haven't gotten anything.
Most people who can see what's in the photo's, are people who are creative and basically have a mind of their own.
Basically they don't understand the images.
All Comments (299)
-
Can't see the baby I see "Patty", I see a slightly bare spot under the arms, and she's got some good sized breasts, her arms and hands are too long to be a person though.
-
All folks should watch MK Davis slowed footage..not YOUTUBE but on the his site to get see and slow down as they please all aspects of the creature/person...decided for yourself but youtube is too limited to all he did...he does believe it to be real....I do not any longer...but check it out for yourself.
-
This creature does have a sag in the upper right bicept that is evident...all primates in the wild are very stealthed in musculature
-
There's clearly something there in front where the breasts would be--you can see it! I think it looks like breasts myself but I've never seen it in any other versions of this video. I've always said this is the real deal. There's a movement and hurrying to get the hell away that's just so real. It wants nothing to do with the men. Also, I've never heard anyone add this but if this was a fake would the man in the suit turn and look at the camera? Of course not.Man's face would be obvious.
-
And as far as the 'butt padding' - how many Squatch asses have you examined, felt, and measured for blue jeans? Where is the Squatch Buttock Padding protocol book located. In other words, how the hell can you say it's not natural looking when no other video has been so clear?
-
@longtalltexan63 Believe what you will. The reason for the 'line' near the hip area is not because of a top and bottom part of a suit. If you pay attention, you'll see an inverted V shaped 'line' at the waist line. This is due to hair (fur) on it's back growing longer in the posterior thoracic region than the lumbosacral region. Have you ever seen a hairy ass dude at a beach with back hair? You'll notice the hair thins at the lumbar area, creating this inverted 'V' shape appearance
-
@LonleyMother Those look like Carol Burnett's boobs ,when she played Norma Desmond.
-
@longtalltexan63 The Bob Heironimus story has been totally debunked. He was some envious neighbor who couldn't stand that Roger Patterson was getting so much attention. He was never able to produce a suit or reproduce the video because the film is REAL. Scientist with a lot more knowledge of bipedal locomotion than you or I have reviewed it, and arrived at this conclusion. Where is your PhD, dude?
-
@longtalltexan63 NOT.
-
@longtalltexan63 Oh gosh, look at that, I didn't notice it at first, good catch. Thanks for watching.
its not a baby its bobies...
LonleyMother 1 year ago 2
@LonleyMother It's both, actually.
PostToastie 1 year ago
Years ago someone suggested the infant hanging on the female(mother) BF. I took a still shot and then adjusted the color, fading in and out and enlarging the area and you can see where the babe is pulling the hair/skin and a leg under the arm pit as it sits on the breast. and a little head. so it is there. MK Davis has done a lot and its interesting how BF researchers prefer to fight over the color of hair instead of unite to get something done. Pride... blinds all. And they do have dna on BF.
kj7sea 1 year ago 8
@kj7sea Great comment, thanks for watching.
PostToastie 1 year ago 5