Robert Englund Phantom review part 1
Uploader Comments (PhantomReviews)
Top Comments
-
This version of PHANTOM is awesome, bloody & creepy!!! Robert's Phantom is hilarious.
All Comments (116)
-
@Poet2916 he's dead ugly. And I don't mean the deformity
-
@KittyxGrimm Seems like it, Doctor.
-
So...Christine is stuck in the big ball of wibbly wobbly timey wimey...stuff?
-
The only thing that bothers me about this version is how it seems the actor playing Phantom acts the same way, makes the same facial expressions as he did playing Freddy. But that's just my opinion.
-
am I the only one that thinks that this Phantom extremely attractive, physically and personality wise?
-
@LesMis931 so most of the movie is just Christine's hallucination, but she's half-conscious? Huh?
-
I love your 'Music of the Night for the sequel' at the end. lol
-
I love the music of the night music to the sequel! ;)
-
as confusing as the plot is, its still awesome.. how ever i think the whole NY think is where Phantom of Manhattan came from, and hence Love Never Dies....eeecch
The Robert Englund version actually has the Phantom in this movie deformed. Just like the book and the Chaney version. I'm not trying to mess up your review, sir. I'm only stating a fact about the movie.
SelenaGomezFan10001 1 year ago
@SelenaGomezFan10001 No it doesnt. A deformity is when you are BORN that way. Erik Destler has his face burned by the devil. So that would be a DISFIGUREMENT. And nothing like the book or Chaney version.
PhantomReviews 1 year ago 11
I have an idea as to why past Christine gets memories (and can sing Erik's lyrics) from her future self: She doesn't. Maybe the memories were from even further into the past. Like the cycle just keeps repeating over and over and over. And she got this in the 1700s or whenever. I don't know. It's just a theory.
pennsylvaniagerl 2 years ago 7
Thats the most sensible suggestion I have heard for this crazy plot. Thanks!
PhantomReviews 2 years ago 5