Emma Goldman - An exceedingly dangerous woman Part 8
Loading...
2,145
Loading...
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (7)
-
@jmatrim Not "they" but this popper yuppie looking Greenhorn who doesn't even seem to understand the difference between Bolshevik Socialism and an Anarchosyndicalistic attitude has nothing but his fullscale arrogance left to make a statement...poor!
Bateman on the other side is something completely different.
-
that is not true, you [Bergman] have accomplished a lot, hope and love
-
completely agree
Loading...
3:00- "She intellectualized a (Bolshevik) revolution she didn't really understand..."
The historians should not necessarily inherit Goldman's own analysis of having made a mistake- she did what she had to do when she had to do it everytime. Is it just me or do they sound a bit arrogant...?
jmatrim 2 years ago 12
It was not her fault the bolsheviks were tyrannical dictatorial socialists. They betrayed her seeing that Anarchists represented freedom and a real threat to their tyrannical reign. Freedom and justice without strengh and organization are folly. What is the point of freedom if you cannot guarrantee Security.
jystyle 2 years ago