Fox: EPA's Jackson Admits That US Acting Alone Will Have No Impact on Climate

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
964 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jul 8, 2009

During a hearing today in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, EPA Administrator Jackson confirmed an EPA analysis showing that unilateral U.S. action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions would have no effect on climate. Moreover, when presented with an EPA chart depicting that outcome, Energy Secretary Steven Chu said he disagreed with EPA's analysis. http://tiny.cc/n3Gmo

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (12)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • great channel

  • Earth = Then new MARS.

    All these monkeys in congress are bird brains uncapable liars who promise something and cant agree on shit. \\

    Representatives of the people?

  • The climate may have been temperate before but anthropogenic impact has taken GHG concentrations FAR past the concentrations of the last climatic optimum. (then:CO2~290 ppm, NOW:CO2~387ppm and rising fast). Im sorry but that history lesson does not discount global warming no matter how much we would like it to. Its just an ignorant excuse for not doing anything to change our harmful actions

  • Even if it's not a large difference that the USA alone makes, we're still making a difference and setting an example. The atmosphere is still sensitive to our emissions therefore at least we're moving towards making some impact. Its about what is right to do. Clean energy is the RIGHT thing to do for our future on this planet.

  • Whatever Jim, you moron, I'm sure that because you think the earth is 6,000 years old that makes you an expert. Hopefully you can bring some of your energy company money with you to hell, where you surely must be going for deliberately selling humanity to Exxon. Doubt you'll be able to spin God.

  • So MORE should be done..

  • re: RomeoMD25

    ==the planet was much warmer

    than it is now==

    According to who?

    greyfalcon. net/ mwp.png

    greyfalcon. net/ mwp

    Also would you be so kind as to define "now"?

  • no, even IF India and China had regulations on their CO2 levels, the earth would still not be affected by this Cap and Trade legislation because of all of the other developing countries in the world.

    Cap and Trade is a bullshit scam to have the highest tax increase in american history

    NO TO CAP AND TRADE

  • Everyone knows it's China with NO EPA guidelines who is the Major polluter in the world.

  • Historical and climatological facts do not support the threat of Global Warming.

    During the last "Climatic Optimum", from 700 to 1200 AD, the planet was much warmer

    than it is now. This led to a population explosion in Scandinavia (which gave rise to the Viking Age)

    Later, during the "Little Ice Age" of 1400 to 1800, Norse settlements in Greenland were wiped out

    and Iceland nearly followed.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more