Ammar Nakshawani Says "The Prophet Did Not Know Who The Monafiqeen Were"

No description available.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Ammar
• Nakshawani
• Says

[bitianx]

rather than to discuss and debate any matter between ourselves, I would like to encourage to speak to the speakers directly and have a conversation with them.

[DefendDeen]

@bitianx yah but Rajabali is ignorant of his own books. Al Kafi actually says the Prophet (pbuh) forgot in prayer. Does he have the guts to speak against Kulayni or Majalisi ? As for Nakshawani don't even ask. Even when his own 12er Shia question him he runs away.

[zeee52]

Please upload the entire video and then state your point.By clipping and cutting a part of what the speaker is saying is just a way of fabricating his real meaning.Just as brother @notgoingnowhere stated that he is contradicting another point of view.

[qazwini]

Salam,

I understand the point you are making regarding the verse however I do not understand it's connection to Hassanain's clip. Hassanain is speaking about those who believe the holy prophet (saw) was not infallible and made mistakes, however not being able to recognize hypocrites is not a mistake, not a sin. Whether he was able to recognize them or not is a blessing of Allah (swt).

Clarification between the clips is appreciated.

[DefendDeen]

@MSH786 IF you want to give you the context of what Hassanain Rajabali said then in Al Kafi it says the Prophet (pbuh) made a mistake in namaz. On top of that Mullah Majalisi rated it sahih.

[MSH786]

@qazwini Thank you! There is no relation between the 2 clips.

[12hamida]

LISTEN TO THESE RAFIDI THEY MAKE A FOOL OUT OF THERE SELVES ALI EVEN COULD RECOGNIZE A HYPOCRIT BUT MUHAMMAD COULDNT SHIA ARE SO EASY TO REFUTE THEY TALK AND FORGET WHAT THERE SOURCES SAY THEY HAVE A HARD TIME DEFENDING THERE DEEN ALSO WHEN YOU GET IN THERE BUISNESS THEY START NAME CALLING THATS THERE DEFENSE

[DefendDeen]

@Catz007 According to the 12ers Taqiyyah is not only for safety. Refer to Kitab al-Hidaya of Shaykh Saduq. Even being nice to Sunnis is taqiiyah in the 12er Shia sect. In another you have to pretend you like us on the outside and hate us in the inside. If you want the ahadith I can post it here.

[Catz007]

That was not under Taqiyyah because I have no reason for Taqiyyah. You don't wish to oppress me and I have no fear of being oppressed. The expression of my views do not endanger Islam. Therefore, I don't need to engage in Taqiyyah.

[Catz007]

@DefendDeen

Which response in Taqiyyah? My response? I believe that not everyone was apostates, but some did khurooj and some usurped, and if they repented, God is Merciful, but I do believe in the Wilayah of Ali (as) after the Prophet.

I prefer not to enter specifics of cursing for 2 reasons: respect for Sunni Muslims and because I believe a general curse over the oppressors of Ahlulbayt is sufficient without entering the details of names.

[DefendDeen]

@Catz007 I don't see any takfir done by Imam Ali (as), yet the 12er call everyone else apostates. There is no reconciliation here. Unless of course you admit, that it is only Allah (swt) to who will be the final judge. On top of that this response can't be under taqiyah.

[Catz007]

Bismillah

@DefendDeen:

Salam

You are trying to expose the extremes: how do you treat the Salafis? How do you treat the Sunni problems in history, when it is impossible to reconcile the Ghadeer sermon and the events of Saqifah, and the war between Umm-ul-Mu'mineen Ayesha and Amir-al-Mu'mineen Ali (as)?