YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

F-16 Living Legacy

LockheedMartinVideos LockheedMartinVideos·472 videos
21,740
41,581
Like     Dislike 5

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like LockheedMartinVideos's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike LockheedMartinVideos's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add LockheedMartinVideos's video to your playlist.

Published on Apr 3, 2012

Lockheed Martin delivered the 4,500th F-16 Fighting Falcon in March 2012. Follow this aircraft's amazing legacy of nearly four decades of defending freedom around the globe.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

All Comments (132)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • XKS99

    It's amazing how far the F-16 has come since the Fighter Mafia days with today's advanced radars and long range air to air missiles. Sprey must be pretty pissed with the viper being kitted out like a mini F-15 these days.

    The F-35 with its massive range, powerful sensors, stealth, and huge external warload capabilities when needed is a true successor to the F-16, and sure to be built in even greater numbers.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XKS99's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XKS99's comment.
  • XKS99

    Also, thrust to weight ratios are deceptive. An F-35 carries MUCH more fuel internally than an F-16, nearly 8500 kg, compared to 2600 kg. At 50% fuel, it matches the 1.1 thrust to weight ratio of the F-16 but still is carrying 2 times as much fuel. Sprey and the APA twist the strengths of the airplane and falsely make them into weaknesses to support their agenda. Sprey especially hates the F-35 because of how wrong he was about how the hi-tech F-15 would do in 1991 over Iraq.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XKS99's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XKS99's comment.
    in reply to incar95678 (Show the comment)
  • XKS99

    As per recent released documents the F-35A is 8 seconds slower than a buck naked F-16 through mach 0.8 to 1.2. Load the F-16 down with weapons and it becomes a complete dog. Pilots say the F-35 energy-maneuverability diagrams match a clean F-18 - short wings or not. F-105 shot down 27 migs for 22 losses, but most of its losses were to AAA, not something maneuver would have helped with, but precision munitions and 360 degree god like vision would. No Mig can outmaneuver an AIM-9X Block II.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XKS99's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate XKS99's comment.
    in reply to incar95678 (Show the comment)
  • incar95678

    I hope it can, it'll be in BIG trouble if it can't. 

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.
    in reply to Stridus7 (Show the comment)
  • incar95678

    Dr Strangelove film with the B52s on base, "Peace is our Profession!" Classic :-)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.
    in reply to Enid2Sacramento (Show the comment)
  • incar95678

    Yep, Fair enough - Cheers! :-)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.
    in reply to biglou117 (Show the comment)
  • biglou117

    Bringing up a fairly old comment lol

    But regardless, I was just saying what they thought :)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate biglou117's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate biglou117's comment.
    in reply to incar95678 (Show the comment)
  • incar95678

    Yep, because it still makes a lot of sense.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.
    in reply to xxxxxHavocxxxxx (Show the comment)
  • incar95678

    Strongly object!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.
    in reply to Heaney5551 (Show the comment)
  • incar95678

    The only thing to do to an F-16 is to remove a lot of the junk/weight thats been added for the last 35 years and stick the current F16E 32,000 Ib engine it it. Vertical takeoff is a gimmick so don't even bother.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate incar95678's comment.
    in reply to crimsoncoin (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later