Personally I would skip over Milton Friedman, because he was a Chicago monetarist, and some of his economic and resulting political views contributed to the pseudo-economic dogmas that plague us today. If you want to understand the breadth of the economics underlying libertarianism, I would cut straight to the Austrian school and read books such as "Human Action", "The Theory of Money and Credit" (Mises). These two alone are life changing. If the reading is too heavy I would suggest Rothbard.
Ron Paul stands for the Libertarianism. You should study Milton Friedman whom was illustrious proponents of the Libertarianism. Just study what are the elements of the Libertarianism. It's not what you think.
As a die hard liberal and supporter of Dennis Kucinich I really respect Ron Paul. He is a great man and an important personality in this debate. The WTO, NAFTA, IMF, World Bank are all our common enemy. Let's hope that his influence does not go away after the elections. Best of luck to all of his supporters. ... Glenn Beck is a complete dip shit though.
I hope it is just by chance that they scrolled Huckabee's word's from an earlier interview saying "paul is dead, paul is dead, paul is dead" at minute 2:15 in this video.
News media, shezzzzz, they are all chicken yellow saps and they want our freedoms to go out the door. They are all UNCONSTITUTIONALLY minded. I hope Beck starts a trail for some of those who are timid and need a push.
1. You could try just not having a scheme. Trade between people happens, whether you try to hurt or help it. it happens.
2. The EU is based more on the soviet model(severely toned down) than the US model. Most of the difference between the two systems(as designed not practiced) is in who is considered absolute sovereign(when push comes to shove). In the US system the people are(Read "I" Am.) In the Soviet system the state is (Read "We" are.)
The criminals fear Dr Ron for good reason.
ryanshaunkelly 9 months ago 2
Personally I would skip over Milton Friedman, because he was a Chicago monetarist, and some of his economic and resulting political views contributed to the pseudo-economic dogmas that plague us today. If you want to understand the breadth of the economics underlying libertarianism, I would cut straight to the Austrian school and read books such as "Human Action", "The Theory of Money and Credit" (Mises). These two alone are life changing. If the reading is too heavy I would suggest Rothbard.
Hapafull 1 year ago
Ron Paul stands for the Libertarianism. You should study Milton Friedman whom was illustrious proponents of the Libertarianism. Just study what are the elements of the Libertarianism. It's not what you think.
mikebostonjones 4 years ago
As a die hard liberal and supporter of Dennis Kucinich I really respect Ron Paul. He is a great man and an important personality in this debate. The WTO, NAFTA, IMF, World Bank are all our common enemy. Let's hope that his influence does not go away after the elections. Best of luck to all of his supporters. ... Glenn Beck is a complete dip shit though.
6458522 4 years ago
Wow. Great interview. After calling RP supporters Nazis, Glenn Beck surprised me. He's redeemed himself.
RangerKozak 4 years ago
RP
08
jarneck78 4 years ago
I hope it is just by chance that they scrolled Huckabee's word's from an earlier interview saying "paul is dead, paul is dead, paul is dead" at minute 2:15 in this video.
I hope
jonldavis 4 years ago
News media, shezzzzz, they are all chicken yellow saps and they want our freedoms to go out the door. They are all UNCONSTITUTIONALLY minded. I hope Beck starts a trail for some of those who are timid and need a push.
Ron Paul 2008!!
SunnyDaysRFun 4 years ago
decent interview. But I think Glen is holding back a bit. It sounds like he wants to slam him like Hannity or O'Reily
DavidKellyTube 4 years ago
1. You could try just not having a scheme. Trade between people happens, whether you try to hurt or help it. it happens.
2. The EU is based more on the soviet model(severely toned down) than the US model. Most of the difference between the two systems(as designed not practiced) is in who is considered absolute sovereign(when push comes to shove). In the US system the people are(Read "I" Am.) In the Soviet system the state is (Read "We" are.)
ModusImpetus 4 years ago