Marc Stevens Pt. 1 of 3
Loading...
Loading...
5,638
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 4:24
Marc Stevens Pt. 2 of 3by paranoidpatriot2,140 views
- 12:42
Marc Stevens (Whole Interview)by paranoidpatriot1,075 views
- 8:15
Beating Civil Traffic Tickets - Part 1 Standingby MrChrisMcPhail24,200 views
- 7:19
Luke Rudkowski at Axiom 2010by paranoidpatriot4,084 views
- 6:34
Alex Jones calls radio show attacking Ron Paulby mustaffa16113,409 views
- 8:23
Three Cases Dismissed in ONE WEEK!!!by paranoidpatriot2,581 views
- 3:12
Black Magic in the Courtsby paranoidpatriot5,114 views
- 8:48
Do the Illuminati run the Street Gangs?by paranoidpatriot148,253 views
- 10:06
Spread this like Fire!!!by Tactikalguy135,998 views
- 5:31
UCC 101by uccvideos24,452 views
- 2:08
Paranoid Patriotby bogartmedia2,547 views
- 10:01
Marc Stevens No State Project Aug 2009 Alistair Kinnear on NLP 9by THAWK3412 views
- 1:33
Mark Stevens Interview With Media Bistro Part 1by MarkStevens56470 views
- 26:19
Paranoid in court, messing with the judge :)by paranoidpatriot3,332 views
- 3:20
Marc Stevens live at Comedy Undergroundby cramsnevets476 views
- 9:50
Marc Stevens-Adventures In Legal Land-4.mp4by THAWK3353 views
- 6:00
Marc Stevens Pt. 3 of 3by paranoidpatriot1,866 views
- 5:02
Beating Civil Traffic Tickets Part 3 - Fair Trial Impossibleby MrChrisMcPhail21,669 views
- 9:57
Liberty Forum 2009 Marc Stevens 2by freestatereport4,300 views
- 13:37
REALITY REPORT #73 - Attention Wal-Mart Shoppersby lonelantern31,298 views
@paranoidpatriot
And there will always be the argument and the results of it. You just can't post any case that supports your cliams.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@RetSquid Wrong, They never admit that they are acting in fraud. They usually dismiss for reasons that we never even brought up. But still dismiss none the less. But they NEVER answer the questions and they always shut us down after just a few questions. But the goal is dismissal and that is what we get, so when they won't admit why they threw it out, that is ok. They still throw it out. Good enough for me. :)
paranoidpatriot 4 months ago
@RetSquid Actually there are no "citizens" or "states" unless you sir/ocean dweller can show any facts or evidence to prove otherwise.
jwhite1016aol 4 months ago
@paranoidpatriot
Yeah, like I said, not proof of your claims. Every case out there proves the 'I don't need a license I'm just travelling, not driving' is crap. Interviews don't help because the claims are not reliable. Most of those intervied are not reliable.
Post some cases where they have won in court, the reasoning WILL be on there, if its due to your arguments.
RetSquid 4 months ago
@RetSquid I know what a citation is. You weren't clear on what you were wanting citations of. Point is this, I have video interviews posted here with people I helped get their cases tossed. I have also interviewed a lot of the folks I have helped on my radio show. I've seen more than ten cases get thrown out using Marc's method. But the judge never gives a real reason for why they dismiss. The most often excuse is "failure to prosecute or prove case."
watch?v=XQX0gorPuEc
paranoidpatriot 4 months ago
@paranoidpatriot
Claims that these ideas work in any court, anywhere. Citations of cases that these ideas have worked in/on. Don't you know what a 'citation' is?
RetSquid 4 months ago
@RetSquid Claims of what? And what do you mean by citations? Citations of what?
paranoidpatriot 4 months ago
@paranoidpatriot
And I've seen tons of claims, they are either proved wrong or they have nothing to back them up. Post a few citations and we'll see which category you fall into.
RetSquid 4 months ago