You speak on behalf of what isn't there anymore - because of their quackery.
Cancer is a fungus...FFS, you just took oncology back into the Bronze Age with that remark.
@NewRiverValleyEMT That would be a hypothesis, if you were speaking about science, and a rather unproven one at that. Without evidence, it will continue to just remain a hypothesis and never reach theory status.
I agree - there are too many crackpots out there. The only one that seems to have any validity is laetrile/amygdalin. This was known to work as early as the 1850's in russia, but guess what - it got suppressed because big pharma cant make money out of a cancer killer which is found in an apricot kernel! The FDA even banned the trees in 1994!
I would like to see the pathology reports of anybody claiming to cure cancer naturally. I believe that there is a natural cure or even a pharmaceutical cure out there but people claiming to cure cancer by alternative means without also posting medical records or pathology reports with their claims are just irresponsible.
we can be sure that anything shown to us on CORPORATE MEDIA is pure garbage. it is manipulation, deceit, and straight up lies. answer: TURN OFF THE TV
@NewRiverValleyEMT correct cancer is a fungus, I speak on behalf of the Darryl Jones Health Resolution centre in Australia. Darryl has been treating stage 3 & 4 cancer patients for nearly 20 years based on this theory.
Big Pharma and other agencies do not want you well, so they keep you on the treadmill (useless drugs).
He's also helped many people with all sorts of other diseases also such as Lupus, Diabetes and all sort of other auto-immune diseases (that are supposed to be in-curable).
@DarrylJonesHealth you're either an idiot or you're an evil murderer
Enlightenment42 3 months ago
This sounds like Royal Rife and his frequency microscope. Otherwise known as Rife Machines.
BCCButters711 5 months ago
@DarrylJonesHealth
You speak on behalf of what isn't there anymore - because of their quackery.
Cancer is a fungus...FFS, you just took oncology back into the Bronze Age with that remark.
@NewRiverValleyEMT That would be a hypothesis, if you were speaking about science, and a rather unproven one at that. Without evidence, it will continue to just remain a hypothesis and never reach theory status.
ChucklesTheSane 6 months ago
@Conquistador2112
I agree - there are too many crackpots out there. The only one that seems to have any validity is laetrile/amygdalin. This was known to work as early as the 1850's in russia, but guess what - it got suppressed because big pharma cant make money out of a cancer killer which is found in an apricot kernel! The FDA even banned the trees in 1994!
LORDGODSIRALEXFERGIE 1 year ago
I would like to see the pathology reports of anybody claiming to cure cancer naturally. I believe that there is a natural cure or even a pharmaceutical cure out there but people claiming to cure cancer by alternative means without also posting medical records or pathology reports with their claims are just irresponsible.
Peace,
Conquistador2112 1 year ago
Hemp Oil
SpikenAL 1 year ago
we can be sure that anything shown to us on CORPORATE MEDIA is pure garbage. it is manipulation, deceit, and straight up lies. answer: TURN OFF THE TV
iAMr3VOLution1 1 year ago
bussines men are the evilest lol
LandOFTHEgun 1 year ago
cancer is viral
jeweledbridge75 1 year ago
@NewRiverValleyEMT correct cancer is a fungus, I speak on behalf of the Darryl Jones Health Resolution centre in Australia. Darryl has been treating stage 3 & 4 cancer patients for nearly 20 years based on this theory.
Big Pharma and other agencies do not want you well, so they keep you on the treadmill (useless drugs).
He's also helped many people with all sorts of other diseases also such as Lupus, Diabetes and all sort of other auto-immune diseases (that are supposed to be in-curable).
DarrylJonesHealth 2 years ago