Project Camelot interviews Igor Witkowski : The Nazi Bell

This interview was recorded in October 2009, but was only published in July 2010 due to technical problems: several tapes were corrupted and one was lost, and the result is the best that I (Bill Ryan) have been able to do with the material.

After a vivid start, the interview is one in which Polish military historian Igor Witkowski drills down, in considerable detail, into the fascinating history of the Nazi Bell - basically an advanced, highly classified physics experiment regarded by the Nazis as being of the highest importance for reasons which are still shrouded in mystery.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Igor Witkowski
• Nazi bell
• Project Camelot
• Project Avalon
• Bill Ryan

[Space0wl]

@majorleeblunt

O yes, it's totally insane...

Kerry even uses bill's side of the page to post her own commercial pay big buck to listen to total shit.

It's a sad fact that everytime i look, Bill's section seems to shrink a little more and Kerry is getting more corrupt, egoistic and bullshitting then ever thought possible before.

The few interviews made by Bill without kerry are very well worth to listen to and well organized.

At least you hear the speaker talk in Bill's interviews.

[InnerOrchestra]

1H42: First rule of interviewing an expert: don't try to convince the expert of your own non expert views. The role of the interviewer is to extract a steady coherent flow of information not to argue our own views or slants with the person that granted the interview and on top interrupt often and not let them finish what they say.

[1awareness]

@seamstobe (It's cool; people bark at each other; on you tube all the time.) I'm not sure; what area your asking me for insight in. But the name of the book is :an introduction to the study of experimental medicine; by Claude Benad. His scientific method on perception; is unique to say it lightly. (You Tube isn't really a good format to explain Claude's theories.)

[seamstobe]

@1awareness Please enlighten me as to what about Claude Bernard I would relate to and where to read this review. I had no idea who he was and just did some initial checking about how he believed humans and animals to be like machines and did all these dissections of animals. I am always open to be further educated and curious what you meant. I do not believe objectivity is possible even though people pretend it can. Sorry I assumed it was an insult. Let us all keep learning together.

[1awareness]

@seamstobe I wasn't insult you.

Claude Bernard; is awesome person;and his book would open you mind. I just; like your comment. (An objective observer; would of read review Claude Bernard; before "Assuming" it was an insult)

[seamstobe]

@matThaHatter I am glad you are not sexist but I find the criticism offensive irrelevant of gender. It is not as if you are paying for a service like a mechanic as you suggest but are putting down someone working to provide you intelligent info for free. Are you sending in a fee and /or contributing to positive action?? and I wonder if people would be so free to bitch in person. Nothing personal it just detracts from info and pleasant contemplation and discussion.. Happy New Year

[matThaHatter]

@seamstobe Look, I totally understand that women often aren't given the respect they are due, no matter WHAT we may claim about equality.

But how come as soon as I criticize something a woman does, it HAS TO BE because she's a woman? If she's exempt from criticism because I MIGHT be a sexist, is that equality?

"Go in search...from another source?" WHAT? If a mechanic fixes your clutch & ignores your brakes, you should say something, regardless of gender. Don't assume we're ALL sexist.

[seamstobe]

@matThaHatter Yes you are forgiven and thanks for removing that vulgar comment. So sarcastic...why if a woman has an opinion do some men feel they have to change her mind or pretend that there is winners and losers in personal opinion. We are all right to ourselves. You are welcome. Be sweet now.

[seamstobe]

@1awareness That is a pretty ignorant insult and has nothing to do with the question at hand. Where did you come up with that one. lol

[1awareness]

@seamstobe (I might of found; someone who's a fan of Claud Bernard)

[matThaHatter]

@seamstobe You know what? You're right. TOTALLY right. After reading what you wrote several times, taking plenty of time between readings to think on and internalize the information, I came to the unquestionable conclusion that everything you said is 100% accurate, while I was 150% WRONG!

I have removed my vulgar comment, & I pray you will forgive my clumsy tongue. Goodbye, & THANK YOU FOR OPENING MY EYES!