Interview Masaru Emoto

Simple Ga6to,
Because he CLAIMS they are science.

If you want to know about morality, read religion and philosophy.

Mysteries are important to human life. Jung demonstrates this clearly when he talks about the power of the symbolic.

My responses are based on Emoto-san's books and claims that these effects are a measurable physical phenomenon. So far his effects cannot be reproduced outside of his control. Thus frankly it is a lie to claim then as such, no matter how positive the concept.

kingcurtiss

I don't get why people think EVERYTHING must be explained by science, when you know that's impossible. And also science is never ever 100% sure so even if it "proves" something it could be disproved a day later. I think that things depend on what a person believes and not on what others say it is.

funny idiot.

No its underrate because it doesn't work in a double blind study.

That is that..

Beautiful ideas, but not science.

Did you ever wonder why plants that are exposed to "classical" music, grow at a faster rate than when exposed to "death metal" To live life finding explanations using only scientific method, is to limit yourself to the technology used to measure such experiments. The first step to understanding is to accept the idea that there are things that exist, that are beyond current scientific measurement, i.e. Coral Castle or Puma Punku Current science can't explain their construction, yet they exist.

Those places you mentioned they are interesting but one major difference is they exist in real time, and thus can be studied. Emoto san's results do not exist outside of his hand picked photos, yet he claims its measurable, that's were I argue.

If Edward Leedskalnin just showed us images of his castle what would we have outside of some photos?

We are discussing reality..right? So lets start with the real tangible things.

Ive made my argument, believe what you feel you need to believe.

This is the problem that I run into with new-agers:

Whatever you call them on, they have another example waiting. Then another, then another... It gets very tiring, and very boring to go around qualitatively disproving every irrational belief that they hold. I'm starting to understand why scientists don't even bother.

If you explained the Coral Castle to jalexander, he would simply move on and ask you to explain 'quantum vibration as described by Rogan Josh' or some other nonsense.

The amount of love, peace, purity etc is not what is being debated here; the only thing up for debate is truth and honesty.

It's a nice message, sure, but is it true? It certainly doesn't agree with the evidence.

It should be ringing bells in the mind of anyone with an active brain: "Water has feelings, and I can prove it with these specially selected photographs! Of course, no one else can, only me." - *Ding* *Ding* *Ding*

There is an amazing purity in truth, you don't need to lie about it.

I wouldn't say the water itself has feeling, but rather the water when exposed to various stimuli, reflects the nature of such stimuli and records it at the time of freezing. Certainly you can experience and differentiate between positive and negative emotions, and record to your memory the feelings such emotions connote. Try not to focus on the water itself, but rather the stimuli and effect on the water. The water is nothing more than a medium like a canvas is to a painting.

I completely understand what it is he is claiming, it need not be explained to me again and again...


And I maintain that it is untrue!

I almost have trouble believing that anyone can listen to this without instinctively sensing that something is wrong, but then I realise that this is a kind of 'Appeal to human suffering' - "Look guys, life is more than just us here on planet earth, the water hurts too!" - but it doesn't work that way. Truth is an absolute, and no amount of 'nice' can bend it.