Chemtrails were Contrails

The images and videos that people present as "chemtrails" are identical to historical reports of contrails. As far back as 1944, contrails were reported to persist, spread, and cover the sky.

See ContrailScience.com for details.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• chemtrails
• contrails
• clouds
• jets
• vapor
• trails

[Jamster303]

@SilkMeadow Yep go visit his site. contrailscienceDOTcom

[montavestaman]

.....think you need to wake up, then go somewhere and get a grip.

[SilkMeadow]

Hmm, does this guy ever explain why we can see two jets flying at the same altitude and only one has a so called persistent contrail? Also, what about Rosland Peterson's video where she shows that no planes should be flying over certain areas but they do and always leave persistent contrails. Is the humidity and temperature always just right everyday over your area as that is how "persistent contrails" work... I think not. Never explains those things, or Morgellons??

[TheDarthChop]

This video's pretty badly done...

I prefer IMPARTIAL opinions... you're just trying to disprove chemtrails all together, without backing anything up (except for a bunch of old newspaper clippings from a time when science was still in it's infancy, and things like HD cameras and the internet were non-existant)

[Epoxynous]

@IExposeMormonism

Google image search for dobsonian slr contrail

You can get a setup like that for well under $1000. So why no photos of suspicious planes?

[IExposeMormonism]

@Epoxynous I guess because they are 30,000+ ft. But you would think someone would have a nice camera that could zoom to good resolution at 5-6 miles. A friend has a lens from a U2 he got at a Lockheed garage sale. it has a resolution of 4inches at 100,000 ft. From C 1965. He should know he designed entire cockpit array's, every emitter and receiver. So, some nut needs to find a good lens and shoot some good pics. Seems like for $5K or so a cam-corder should pick up enough info to say something.

[Epoxynous]

@IExposeMormonism So why can't someone take a good photo of these odd aircraft?

[IExposeMormonism]

@Epoxynous Perhaps some people do something wrong in sampling. I know bureaucrats do! And what ever it is, it's not solids in fuel. putting aluminum in solution and it coming out in the exhaust isn't the answer. For this to be real means it's mixed, micron sized stuff, some kind of storage, emitted in air. what I see are not commercial jets. None land at Fresno, the number of planes and the inconsistency in their appearance in the sky shows me they aren't regular scheduled aircraft

[Epoxynous]

Which people? They are finding big numbers because they are doing it wrong, often doing things like testing sludge instead of water, or testing old snowpack, or simply getting their units wrong. No municipal water supply (and there are hundreds of them, who all test the water every year) has reported these big numbers.

Did you know that aluminum makes up 8% of the earth's crust. Hence it's in every speck of dust. Pretty hard to keep a few micrograms out of your water sample.

[IExposeMormonism]

@Epoxynous No, Something is wrong. I would like skydaddy AlGore to take a stand but he wont. some persistent trails may be contrails but not all. too many people are obtaining big numbers of aluminum and barium in water samples. I never see these planes land at Fresno, not in 100 trips in 3 years. Not that I blame anyone for flying past Fresno.....