(Kent Hovind) Creation Seminar 1 - Age of the Earth Part 4

These Seminars are NOT copyrighted. If you are interested in helping support Kent Hovind his video series is available on DVD at: http://shopping.drdino.com/view_item.php?id=447DVD

Kent Hovind's Creation Seminar 1 "The Age of the Earth" Gives scientific evidence to prove a literal six-day creation, Dr. Kent Hovind refutes evolution's proposition that the earth has evolved over billions of years. The first of seven in the seminar series, The Age of the Earth, uncovers the follies of the Big Bang theory as well as exposing the religious beliefs of evolution.

This Creation Seminar is only one of the seven listed below:
Creation Seminar 1 - The Age of the Earth
Creation Seminar 2 - The Garden of Eden
Creation Seminar 3 - Dinosaurs and the Bible
Creation Seminar 4 - Lies in the Textbooks
Creation Seminar 5 - The Dangers of Evolution
Creation Seminar 6 - The Hovind Theory
Creation Seminar 7 - Questions and Answers

Below are direct links to each part of Seminar 1, which is 16 parts long.

Part 1 http://youtube.com/watch?v=WIeLRD1L9yY

Part 2 http://youtube.com/watch?v=tr2CP86XVuw

Part 3 http://youtube.com/watch?v=GwuvYtBNZsk

Part 4 http://youtube.com/watch?v=rW5_zAmS5mQ

Part 5 http://youtube.com/watch?v=z9HF0U19IhA

Part 6 http://youtube.com/watch?v=PMeUoMyI8zM

Part 7 http://youtube.com/watch?v=hrYysNbs5tQ

Part 8 http://youtube.com/watch?v=z6VNupezA14

Part 9 http://youtube.com/watch?v=F_JZHslDfXw

Part 10 http://youtube.com/watch?v=FCOGDfzkxMk

Part 11 http://youtube.com/watch?v=PpsyfBzS27s

Part 12 http://youtube.com/watch?v=ByChlQE8m3Q

Part 13 http://youtube.com/watch?v=QP6zZ75UJ8M

Part 14 http://youtube.com/watch?v=CvWtGx9Baeo

Part 15 http://youtube.com/watch?v=0Pj1pJl-LX8

Part 16 http://youtube.com/watch?v=1TLAQC-tjsQ

If you want to watch this seminar uncut go to: http://www.veoh.com/videos/v6295786XK83SR4E

If you just go to the link above this paragraph and watch it directly off of the website, the quality is not very good. But if you install VeoTV (which you can download from the last link at the bottom of this page) you can download the fullscreen uncut version of this seminar which is only 700 MB in size.

If you cannot play the video once you have downloaded it, you will need to install Divx 6 (A video codec) which you can download at: http://www.divx.com/divx/windows/

One other site that I have uploaded this seminar (cut version) is at: http://www.livevideo.com/Joshua271987

You can download VeoTV here at: http://www.veoh.com/downloadFlow.html

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• Creationist
• Religion
• Jesus
• God
• Atheism
• Darwin
• Evolution
• Carbon
• Dating
• Big
• Bang
• Evolve
• Natural
• Selection
• Bible
• Science

[kelbykross1]

didn't you all know the world began right around the agricultural revolution, after man domesticated the dog?

[oopscanada]

@RJL738 We have particles everywhere, and the believe that one particle produced the rest, is not only illogical but unrealistic. It is therefore, much more intelligent to believe that there exist a being outside the universe who is capable of creating the Universe from *nothing*. that is right, *from nothing*. So, in the end, its the same thing, except, that He really created everything from nothing. The big bang assumes there was a little something. Where does this it come from

[JungleJargon]

"...they don't want to bury it (the big bang) because *they* have nothing to replace it with."

The creation of the elements had to be ordered because most of the most common elements result in obeying the orders of a preexisting word.

Think about that. Nothing ever works according to a plan without being made to work.

So we have about 18 or so essential elements that have billions of ordered functions only because of the way they are made.

watch?v=lEledPONpkQ

[HelloWorld1947]

@mrdalerod1-then why do u watch him? ur the idiot for watching, not him....nobody dragged u here and held a gun 2 ur head and made u watch. And besides hes awesome! nothing but truth comes out of his mouth.....if u got issues got and debate him otherwise dont be an idiot and watch. simple

[RJL738]

I do just for clarification believe the Earth and most of the universe is somewhere between 13,000 and 14,000 years old closer to 14 thousand not 6,000 or so years, most likely just over 13,600 eyars old. The remaining fraction or small fraction of the universe is older maybe a few billion years old. The full enternt of the rang of Young Earth Creationism would be from 6,000 years maybe just under still about 6 thousand to just over 16,000 years.

[RJL738]

Acting like the universe is a giant machine like the simple machines we use. This apeal to common reasoning saying there is something heavily mechanical about the may space works is just into something that works. It's not that there isn't some kind of design behind it but this kind of reasoning cannot be applied. Also not that there is nothing outside the universe but the big bang is said to be the expanding of even space so angular momentum deosn't work.

[RJL738]

I'm not saying I believe in the big bang but one maybe commonly overlooked characteristic about the Big Bang is that it did not begin from an infinitely small point. It would have been trillions and trilllions and trillions and trillions or whatever times smaller than the volume or even diameter of the smallest subatmoic particle known. That spinning of a dot or condensing refers to how a solar system would form.

[tha1ne]

To be fair, hovind is an eloquent speaker and his points are very appealing to intuition. However, he has no evidence to support his claims but he can gloss this over with his eloquence, something every effective politician is able to do

[gregrutz]

''As the Nebula shrank, it spun faster and faster''

I always wonderd where this IDiot got the idea a dot can spin, he mis-quotes a paper talking about Nebula. Stupid, just stupid.

[BlueCrystal021]

one of his main arguments is the 2nd law of thermo dynamics which he misquotes and takes out of context. he claims that it points out everything tend to chaos. he fails however to mention the second part of the law of thermodynamics: that the energy is used for growth and repair and productivity. also, the law actually states that things want to be more at rest not at chaos... i.e. something that is hot wants to get rid of that excess energy... his applying this to buildings is wrong