flag@whitehouse.gov

Flag@whitehouse.gov Is Government at its worst ... The Obama Admistration want to keep track of free speech and what you think and say... So send them you junk emails and defend your free speech rights..

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Flag@whitehouse.gov
• Is
• Government
• at
• its
• worst
• ...
• The
• Obama
• Admistration
• want
• to
• keep
• track

[israelbustos81]

motherfucking govt. already knows whats on our computers, now they want us to help make their job easier?! FUCK THE GOVERNMENT!!! REPORT THAT!!!

[pathfinderdaddy]

he does know the law, and that he's breaking it, that's why he's bringing in a scab army of blue helmet dipshits and hiring a private security force of bootlicking losers to die for him.

[shawnee2014]

s, it has managed to hacked the Systm missiles in India are capable of blocking a uss cvn 74 in middle of the ocean so how barack obama said a response by WDM then how in the case of an attack by missiles virtual shaped charges great for people Peigi pentagon

[AndroidPolitician]

Wiretaps are fine, just not warrentless.

Seriously giving the government that power is ineffective cause everyone is now a lead.

Take for instance what happened with the cameras in Britain.

[timghouston]

Actually, I read the comments(including yours-but all the ones around it) and took my addressing you in the reply WAS out of context. My apologies. Doesn't change my feelings about what I'd sacrifice as my personal sense of duty. Like doin' time for not rattin' on a friend. Some are willing, some not. Some would call that foolish, some would admire the character it takes, if it was a decision made with conscious awareness, and not foolishness.

[timghouston]

No,AndroidPolitician, I removed my comment from 9/14/09-a response to you. The earlier one, after I re-read the comments, was not directed at you, although I might have hit your "reply". Either that or I may have read the comments anound this out of context. I do, though feel, that My general acceptance of wiretaps vs. me, in the cause of National Security(again, to ME), is a sacrifice of my right to privacy that Iwould give up, like my time to serve in combat. That's just me.

[AndroidPolitician]

I kind of laughed at this comment but then I realized you were being serious.

Warrantless wiretaps aren't just against the constitution but there useless because now 300 million people are suspects. I'm not even going to try to dignify the rest of the comment by addressing it.

[timghouston]

No, I didn't miss that. After 9/11, I felt like approving that warrantless wiretapping was a necessaary function to combat terrorists. I'm a citizen who feels better knowing we haven't had mass strikes since then. I wonder how many attacks never occurred that we don't hear about due to those wiretaps. I don't have a problem with people who object to violation of privacy, nor Sen. Wilson with freedom of speech. There's no clause about "except about, or too, the president.

[AndroidPolitician]

I think you missed the part about the wiretaps being warrantless.

(that means you don't need a warrant to engage in one to clarify)

[timghouston]

Yeah, dipshit, that was for terrorism, not health care. I, for one, didn't mind people checking on me in Homeland Security, you weak pimple AndroidPolitushin, cause I don't have anything to worry about as a bombmaker or other scumbag. But thought police on healthcare? On Inaugural Day a minister had a poem about"yellow be mellow, and white learn what's right". How about brown not being a clown an' stoopin' down

[AndroidPolitician]

Yes having the government search anyone it wants without any warrant (note the WITHOUT A WARRANT part) is ok but collecting emails to address certain concerns is pure evil.