The Big Bang Never Happened

This video highlights a discovery by two famous astronomers that invalidates the Big Bang theory.

For more scientific proof that our current theories are wrong, visit the Thunderbolts web site at http://www.thunderbolts.info or my personal web site at http://sites.google.com/site/cosmologyquest

You can also watch a full feature length video on the subject at:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4773590301316220374&q=electric+un...

This video and my web site are not affilitated with the Thunderbolts project.

A published paper on the subject:

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1987ApJ...319..687S

The galaxy-quasar connection - NGC 4319 and Markarian 205. I - Direct imagery. II - Spectroscopy
Sulentic, Jack W.; Arp, Halton C.
Astrophysical Journal, Part 1 (ISSN 0004-637X), vol. 319, Aug. 15, 1987, p. 687-708.

New direct-imaging data are presented for the disturbed spiral galaxy NGC 4319 (z = 0.005) and the apparently connected quasar-like object Markarian 205 (z = 0.072). Image processing of this CCD data reveals (1) an almost continuous luminous connection extending from Mrk 205 into the nucleus of the spiral galaxy; (2) a corresponding feature on the opposite side of the disk, appearing to link a bright UV knot with the nucleus; and (3) extensive morphological peculiarities in NGC 4319 that are consistent with hypothesized explosive nuclear activity. These data support the conclusion that NGC 4319 is an active spiral galaxy that recently ejected Mrk 205 from its nucleus.


rebuttals:
http://www.haltonarp.com/articles/rebuttals

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Halton
• Arp
• NGC4319
• M205
• galaxies
• galaxy
• cosmology
• quest
• astronomy
• redshift
• big
• bang
• thunderbolts
• Sulentic
• quasar
• pairs
• relativity
• theory
• electric
• universe
• plasma

[mucephi1]

I am dumber for having even watched this crap

[johnnythexxxiv]

this is a terrible argument. it only shows that these galaxies are either approaching each other, having shot out at different trajectories, or that they are further seperating, which would HELP the idea of the big bang. so much fail.

[mukkohaha]

@johnnythexxxiv Your Imaginative Dark matter and Dark energy that has never been observed or proven is not science, your religion is a hoax, go away ^^

[Totallytiger08]

and this proves what? Also: Do you have rights to the song Jupiter written and composed by Gustav Holst? A part of the seven piece orchestral suite, The Planets?

[Miner3141]

You what people listen to this in science you need two things to get a third and when the " big bang" happened there was the energy and " dark matter" something science can't explain so under science dark matter doesn't exist and in turn the big bang is invalidate

[MrKorrazonCold]

Everything all in one single moment magically came from nothing!

Now there's a spooky dark energy and galaxies are flying away from each other at a million miles an hour as the universe gradually becomes impoverished and dies from the big rip into the infinite ocean of space, "Blackholes suck everything in with a magical force, that comes out when nothing else can." These might violate the laws of conservation, but don't worry about that.

"Don't mess with my narrow minded fucking stupid shit"

[sallybaker1950]

The Big Bang is my religon...... Don't mess with my religion, or I will cut your.... I will cut your fricken..... funding!

How many PHD's would be worth nothing. Even the tenured would be leaping from belltowers

[MrBloooey]

All this proves is that the quasar is at the SAME distance as the galaxy and was most likely EJECTED from it! If you think this somehow disproves the big bang theory, YOU'RE NUTS!

[CarlSagan6]

@nayanmalig Bullshit. Dark matter distributions can most definitely be mapped via doppler/velocity surveys, multi-wavelength spectroscopy, and gravitational lensing techniques (particularly those done on dense galaxy clusters and merging galaxies). It's not a wild guess. It's a well-substantiated model.

[CarlSagan6]

@nayanmalig dammit! we have more than sufficient reason to propose that some form of weakly-interacting, nonluminous matter exists! I'm am at this very moment typing this reply on a computer on a desk in a XENON (a dark matter search collaboration) research and development lab. And don't give me this bullshit of "oh, it's a completely unverifiable theory."