YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville

Stelios james-foster Stelios james-foster·73 videos
1,810
807,967
Like     Dislike 707

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like Stelios james-foster's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike Stelios james-foster's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add Stelios james-foster's video to your playlist.

Uploaded on Sep 7, 2007

Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville. The wing shaped hole was already in the ground in 1994.

http://www.davidicke.com
http://www.vivapalestina.org
http://www.bigcampaign.org
http://www.boycott-israel.co.uk/
http://wikispooks.com/wiki/9/11:Israe...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Video Responses


All Comments (11,102)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • noscreenname3

    What about the broken off cockpit that went into the woods ? How about the entire engine that was said to be found 600 yards away ?

    BTW describe in which way the plane hit the ground for me if you will, thank you.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate noscreenname3's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate noscreenname3's comment.
    in reply to Michael Gilman (Show the comment)
  • ctcole77

    3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?

    If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?

    How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ctcole77's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ctcole77's comment.
    in reply to Dave Beck (Show the comment)
  • ctcole77

    3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    Since Larry Silverstein said pull it, demolished WTC 7 and collected billions in insurance, why would the insurance company pay the claim if there's evidence of fraud?

    If WTC 1 & 2 were destroyed by demolition & not fire, how do you explain video of the exterior columns buckling under heat and stress loads 18 minutes after impact?

    How can Marvin Bush be in charge of WTC security when he stopped working for Securecom in June of 2000?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ctcole77's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate ctcole77's comment.
    in reply to MrShiftaltnumlock (Show the comment)
  • Brenda Shaffer

    Why is it your business how old I was when 9/11 happened? I will just say I had 2 young sons when it happened. I was in elementary school when Vietnam started. Believe me, I do a lot of research on stuff. Maybe you ought to just back off from me & everyone else who can prove you WRONG, idiot. You are still not worth my time. I got better things to do, like tell the truth.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Brenda Shaffer's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Brenda Shaffer's comment.
    in reply to Dave Beck (Show the comment)
  • JohnMYX

    "there's Stanley Kubrick who was used to film the moon landings by Rumsfields own words" LOL you realize the source you took this from is a PARODY FILM right? Say goodbye to your credibility.

    "there's a bullet that strikes Kennedy from the front" People think this because JFK's head snapped backwards. That only happens in movies. In reality people pull TOWARDS the entrance wound because the exit wound creates a "jetstream' of tissue matter that exerts force in the opposite direction.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JohnMYX's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate JohnMYX's comment.
    in reply to Dave Beck (Show the comment)
  • Michael Gilman

    A plane smashed directly into the ground at over 500 mph. Do you expect it to be in one or two pieces in the same area as the impact? There was wreckage scattered over 3 miles. The local coroner Wallace Miller says he spent weeks on his hands and knees picking up body parts out of the ground..... And you suggest no planes hit the tower? That's some crazy Nico Haupt shit. Even the Truth movement says that dude is crazy.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Gilman's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Michael Gilman's comment.
    in reply to Dave Beck (Show the comment)
  • cchris874

    misleading people ct'd. . . .

    They mislead not on purpose, but by not understanding the nature of evidence. If truthers insisted on the same standards embraced by the scientific community and the peer review process - rather than phony peer-reveiw journals (e.g. Steven Jones); self-published essayists, David Ray Griffin and other non-scientists like Richard Gage - there would be no "truth mvt." The truth mvt succeeds so long as its methods eschew the scientific process.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cchris874's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cchris874's comment.
    in reply to MrShiftaltnumlock (Show the comment)
  • cchris874

    "Speaking of seeing thru a lens or filter, can you honestly say that you are not looking thru a filter yourself?"

    That's a fair point. No one can make sense of what they see and read and hear w/o a simplfying apparatus. But it's a question of degree. I try my hardest to go by solid evidence. I do not believe Dave scores terribly high in the "look at both sides" department. Some people are more prone to oversimplification that others. I claim Dave is much more so that me (IMHO of course)

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cchris874's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate cchris874's comment.
    in reply to MrShiftaltnumlock (Show the comment)
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later