Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
402,277
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 7, 2007

Proof that 9/11 flight 93 did not crash at Shanksville. The wing shaped hole was already in the ground in 1994.

http://www.davidicke.com
http://www.vivapalestina.org
http://www.bigcampaign.org

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,384)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @zenoist2 No, because the hole in the pic is a different mark.

    No, because the grass is green and therefore not dry.

    No, because there were lots of pieces of debris found of which the ones you describe are just a couple.

    No, because they knew hijackers were crashing planes and that the onboard phonecalls,ensuing overheard struggle and the behaviour of the plane as described by those who say it out of normal control then crash into a field would suggest no bombs were present.

  • Amazing it it hit an exact shaped hole with deadly accuracy isnt it?

    Amazing the intense heat didnt burn the dry grass isnt it?

    Amazing the intense fireball and impact that destroyed solid titanium alloy engines somehow left the inevitable terrorists passports totally unscathed along with a terrorist bandana totally unsinged.

    Amazing the terrorist repeatedly says "we have a bomb on board"

    then the whole plane vanishes in an explosion and nobody even tests for explosives isnt it?

  • Without even covering the rest of the bullshit in this vid, when compared with a number of aerial shots it is clear that nothing in the 94 pic has anything to do with the actual impact zone. So,your definitely no scientist and you maybe are a bit stupid.

  • @s040978 : The scar on the ground was there prior to 9/11.

    Are you lost or something?!?! The hole in the ground was already there. It's a fucking scam, Dumbass, just like the rest of the event.

  • @s040978 ; ROFL

    Your dad works for American so he knows everything about government cover-ups?

    ROFL. If you take the visual evidence of Shanksville & compare it with 10 other plane crashes it says it all. You really need to focus on how to read/write basic English.

    Not every part of the engine turns into air RETARD!!! In tenerife it happened to Pan Am, but the engines were left on by the captain who was injured when KLM hit them. You can still see the engines from both planes though, MORON!!!

  • you are stupid man the wing line is across the dark line its just you are a failure at life and dont like to admit it

  • @BadBoriBoy hay dum ass yes they would not in to air but when you hit a solid object going 300-500 mph it dose and that dose not include the rate at witch they were falling my dad works for american and yes there were 3 air craft that went down that day excuse me 4 i think i would know my dad did not go to work for 3 days because of this in cedent your a dum ass and a piece of shit if you think the government would cause this you all are dum fuck i wish you were the one how had died that day

  • @asicit2b ; THE GREAT THERMATE DEBATE is the best by Jonathan Cole under the physicsandreason channel!!!!

    lcpies is going off emotion only. No critical thinking skills what so ever.

  • @lcspies As you know I do not discuss the thermite stuff, BUT this video is impressive and proves a few things. watch -( THERMITE CUTTING STEEL -- EXPERIMENTALLY DEMONSTRATED)

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more