SEPTEMBER CLUES EPILOGUE (NEW)

The SEPTEMBER CLUES website: http://www.septemberclues.info

The SEPTEMBER CLUES forum: http://www.cluesforum.info

On 9/11, the US TV networks used computer generated sceneries of Manhattan. Multiple techniques of image manipulation were employed to simulate "airplanes crashing into the World Trade Center". We now have conclusive evidence that the TV networks were proactively complicit in staging this false-flag operation needed to gather public consensus to wage immensely profitable, illegal wars.

The forensic analysis of the live images leave no room for doubt : they do not depict authentic imagery nor real airplane crashes but turn out to be entirely doctored video sequences which effectively fooled the worldwide TV audience. Thus, the live broadcasts now stored in the major TV networks' archives, constitute the most solid, verifiable and repeatable proof to expose the falseness of the official version of the 9/11 tragedy.

The subsequently released, so-called "amateur" videos were more sophisticated video composites yet all have now been exposed for what they are : total forgeries. Most likely, electromagnetic technology (commonly used in war zones (to jam electronic circuitries) prevented any private footage being recorded at the time of the tower strikes. Scores of testimonies confirm that cellphones or firefighters' walkie-talkies did not function properly in NYC that day.

Most on-the-scene witnesses reported a SMALL aircraft of some sort : Arguably, what they saw was a winged missile. The 4 purported hijacked flights, as well as the related passenger lists, turn out to have several problems as far as their authenticity is concerned : a long list of documentation (or lack of it) reveal serious discrepancies regarding NTSB, BTS and FAA data. All of the above facts, taken together, suggest that none of the official descriptions of the events are credible.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• 9/11
• 911
• television
• news
• septemberclues
• september
• 11
• tv
• fakery
• cnn
• fox
• cbs
• nbc
• abc
• bbc
• wtc
• bush
• shoes
• crime
• crash
• hate
• love
• no
• war
• planes
• hoax
• dogs
• cats
• boys
• girls
• commercial
• free

[siti1ca]

Some of the things you present have some merit. However, with regard to the police officer...

He was recounting his duty on the morning of 9/11, and they went and saw flim for pick up on 9/11. NOT OF 9/11! Anyone who took photos of 9/11 certainly wouldn't go under the WTC after it had already been attacked, to drop film off

[simonshack]

@siti1ca Oh, I see: yet you believe that the NYPD would have sent their men under the WTC after it had been attacked - due to their concern about salvaging people's films made BEFORE 9/11?...

Woooh, yes - that makes perfect sense ! :-D

[siti1ca]

@simonshack I don't disagree with this point. Why were they down there. maybe to secure gold and silver, kept in the basement? make sure no one else was down there watching? maybe. But surely you can't stand behind the fact, that anyone would be able to take pictures at 8:46, go underground of the building that had been under attack, and expect that they would get those pics back.(?)

[simonshack]

@siti1ca Hmm...you seem to assume the policeman refers to some underground store underneath the WTC. Please note there is a cut/edit in this Italian TV docu - at 4:39 - so part of the interview is evidently missing. (Btw, I actually made a mistake in transcribing the policeman's words: At 4:44 he says "we went into every little DEPARTMENT store" - not "photographer store" - as I have erroneously captioned).

Anyhow, WHY would the NYPD impound people's film rolls on the morning of 9/11?

[Mr1233556]

ok if it was a missle then tell me..how did people not see it taking of from some where???????

[simonshack]

@Mr1233556 If it was a missile like the winged JASSM AGM158, this is an AIR-TO-GROUND missile which is dropped from military aircraft. No chance for anyone to see where the missile was launched from.

[TheDooneyUK]

This guy's entire series has just raped the governents of the super power countries

[dillondan63]

You opened my eyes up!! THANKS!!

[grezzer31]

@simonshack

You should have noted at 9:02 the police officer's reaction to the question. A basic understanding of body language tells you that licking your lips is a sign of nervousness, as seen here. Also he brings his lips into his mouth, which tells you that he is trying to keep some information from being spilled. Another is that he turns his head to the right, showing he doesn't like the question. Finaly he can't keep eye contact throughout the question. He is no doubt hiding something.

[KingLeipzig]

@simonshack

What do you think???

Was this Eye witness people CIA AGENTS??

[hencloud]

Simon your video is very interesting and there certianly are anomolies. You lost me however at the point where you describe the gash in the facade being created and shaped by exposives. This would mean an exact prediction of where the missile would strike - really! - 3-4 floors out and the gash would have appeared above or below the main hole. This bit does sound a little bit far feteched. Do you have a further explanation for this?

[MrStrman]

We need a new independent investigation. First arrest the entire last 911 commission because they already have proven that they were nothing but a coverup. Start with the media's role and investigate them first if they have been caught showing us a special effects movie because if the media is in on this crime, then they are nothing but a giant brainwashing tool and actually responsible for most of the unrest in the world.

[siti1ca]

@simonshack to pick it up an hour later. I agree with you why were the police under there? but it wasn't to take people's photos of the attack is what i am saying

[siti1ca]

@simonshack that's correct. If you watch the full interview of this video,( I believe,but could be wrong) the police officer makes mention of the video store. And i believe they even show the video of the underground photography shop of WTC. Remember there was a whole city block under there eateries, clothing store etc. Correct he says department store. regardless, my point is, you would not shoot photos of the WTC as it was burning then, go under it to drop off your film, and assume