Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If consciousness itself is the synthesising of quantum information into a higher state of coherence, in some respects all of reality exists as conscious potentiality; a universe, the very fabric of which, coded in the holographic language of perception.
If you are intersted by this, wacth my video, "Entanglement and Consciousness - A new Paradigm of Mind and Matter"
I wonder how David Bohm understood everything about thought and the "me" and how it runs your life and wrote a book about it, called "Thought as a System", but still he wasn't able to dissolve it in himself. He is said to have suffered from depression during his life and he was also depressed before he died, and it seems to me that he wasn't at ease with himself, as interviews show. So how come he wasn't able to deal with it in himself? Was it because he only understood it intellectually?
As Bohm himself makes clear in Thought as a System, having an insight into Thought is not as easily come by for anybody...this is due to the very nature of the process itself which acts very rapidly and traps one into well worn patterns in the very act of considering it- that Bohm was unable to deal with it in himself does not in any way discredit what he had to say about the nature of Thought which is still quite relevant for all interested people.
But, my friend (gennaro8gattuso), why would you bother so much about whether David Bohm was like this or like that? Isn't it enough to hear what one has to say, and see if it is truth or not? I do appreciate your own doubts and thoughts, but, in this present case, why spend energy in investigating someone else's life, supposing this and that, insinuating that and the other, guessing? Isn't the real question "MYSELF"? Me and my mind? Why talk about someone, else, then?
well alan watts said "to understand something intellectually is to see it all the way through" now im not sure that this is entirely true but in academia this seems to be the general consensus, and I can see how David Bohm could have been depressed if he was a beleiver in such a view because then he might suffer from the "I understand too much" syndrome, which is a very terrifying feeling indeed. in my experience with Bohm it seems not unlikely that he could have thought that way..quite a genius
The thing people never take for granted is that as someones knowledge increases the perception of that cannot be explained through dialogue. So evidently we just get more distance aslong as we understand we are smarter than the rest. Bohm just tapped into how large the difference was between people ''acting'' compared to himself. I also think he just saw the deeper meaning behind was funny - which would be the control factor.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
If you are intersted by this, wacth my video, "Entanglement and Consciousness - A new Paradigm of Mind and Matter"
He is said to have suffered from depression during his life and he was also depressed before he died, and it seems to me that he wasn't at ease with himself, as interviews show.
So how come he wasn't able to deal with it in himself? Was it because he only understood it intellectually?