PART (1) NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL VS THE STATE OF OHIO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MARCH 15,2005. CAUSE OF LAWSUIT: UNCONSTITUTIONAL GARNISHMENT OF WAGES,DENIAL OF EQUAL PROTECTION,DUE PROCESS AND PRIVACY UNCONSTITUTIONAL TAKING OF PROPERTY. INVIDIOUS DISCRIMINATION AND THE DENIAL OF THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. INTRODUCTION: SOMEWHERE IN OR AROUND JANUARY 2005. A COURT ORDER WAS ISSUED BY THE STATE OF OHIO COURT, AND COLLECTION AGENCY OHIO C.S.P.C. TO GARNISH, I PETITIONER, PRO SE NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL. THERE WAS NO TRIAL, NO BILL OF EXCHANGE NO CONSIDERATION, BY THE STATE OF OHIO. ON FEB.8,2005 I SENT A NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUE. IT WENT TO THE OHIO C.S.P.C. THEY RESPOND. GROUND FOR GRANTING REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES. BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE GREAT SEAL MOORISH NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AND DIVINE PROVIDENCE. I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL, ASSERT MY FULL SOVEREIGN POWER AS A FREE MOOR(NATURAL BEING) PURSUANT TO WIT. THE FREE MOORISH ZODIAC CONSTITUTION. THE GREAT SEAL, THE 1836 MOROCCAN TREATY OF PEACE AND FRIENDSHIP, THE 1790 SUNDRY FREE MOOR ACT. THE 1791 ORGANIC U.S. CONSTITUTION, THE UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS(1948) UNITED NATIONS DRAFT DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE(ACTION OF 2ND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS JULY 4,1776. (1) THE ORGANIC 1791 UNITED STATES REPUBLIC CONSTITUTION IS THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND AND ALL TREATIES. (ARTICLE 6 SECTION 2) U.S. CONSTITUTION STATES THAT "THIS CONSTITUTION AND THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES WHICH SHALL BE MADE IN PURSANCE THEREOF AND ALL TREATIES MADE OR WHICH SHALL BE MADE, UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAW AND THE JUDGES IN EVERY STATE SHALL BE BOUND THEREBY ANYTHING IN THE CONSTITUTION OR LAWS OF ANY STATE TO THE CONTRARY NOT WITHSTANDING. U.S. CODE TITLE 4 CHAPTER 1: AND ANY LAW THAT IS REPUGNANT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS NULL AND VOID. U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE (MARBURY V. MADISON 5 U.S. 137,174,176 (1803) CHEIF JUSTICE JOHN MARSHALL DECLARED THAT IN ANY CONFLICT BETWEEN THE CONSTITUTION AND A LAW PASSED BY CONGRESS THE CONSTITUTION MUST ALWAYS TAKE PRECEDENCE. FURTHER MORE ARTICLE (3) SECTION(1) U.S. CONSTITUTION STATES "THE JUDICIAL POWER OF THE UNITED STATES SHALL BE VESTED IN ONE SUPREME COURT AND IN SUCH INFERIOR COURTS AS THE CONGRESS MAY FROM TIME ORDAIN AND ESTABLISH. THE JUDGES BOTH OF THE SUPREME AND INFERIOR COURTS SHALL HOLD THEIR OFFICES DURING GOOD BEHAVIOR AND SHALL AT STATED TIMES RECEIVE FOR THEIR SERVICES A COMPENSATION WHICH SHALL NOT BE DIMINISHED DURING THEIR CONTINUANCE IN OFFICE." THE STATE OF OHIO COURTS ARE DE-FACTO COURTS OPERATING AGAINST THE U.S. CONSTITUTION AND THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL IN HIS DE JURE CAPACITY HEREBY MAKE THIS SPECIAL APPEARANCE NOT GENERAL APPEARANCE TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION, ESTABLISH JUSTICE, INVOKE AND ENFORCE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW FOR THE RELIEF OF INJURIES. I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL AM A FREE SOVEREIGN MOORISH INDIGENOUS, FREEHOLD BY INHERITANCE,FREE MAN( NOT A FREEDMAN)(RESIDENT) OR A (PERSON) THAT CAN BE NAME IN OHIO REVISED CODES. THE OHIO COURT DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER, NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH EL, FOR THE TERM PERSON DOES NOT INCLUDE THE SOVEREIGN. PERSONS AS DEFINED IN THE OHIO REVISED CODE(PERSON); MEANS THE STATE ANY POLITICAL SUB-DIVISION ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL BODY, THE UNITED STATES AND ANY PERSON AS DEFINED IN SECTION 1.59 OF THE REVISED CODE. U.S. V. COOPER CORP 312 U.S. 600,604 (1941) "THE GOVERNMENT ADMITS THAT OFTEN THE WORD PERSON IS USED SUCH A SENSE AS NOT TO INCLUDE THE SOVEREIGN" I NOBLE SHAHEED ALLAH AM NOT THE PERSON NAMED IN ANY OF THE OHIO REVISED CODES, STATED IN THE COURT ORDER OF CHILD SUPPORT, AND WAGE GARNISHMENT. YICK WO AND WOO LOO V. HOPKINS 118 U.S. 356 (18560 SOVEREIGNTY, ITSELF IS OF COURSE NOT SUBJECT TO LAW, FOR IT IS THE AUTHOR AND SOURCE OF LAW BUT IN OUR SYSTEM WHILE SOVEREIGN POWERS ARE DELEGATED TO THE AGENCIES OF GOVERNMENT SOVEREIGNTY IT SELF REMAINS WITH THE PEOPLE BY WHOM AND FOR WHOM ALL GOVERNMENT EXISTS AND ACTS." (MORE INFORMATION ON PART 2)
islam, just had dismissal for a petition of contempt. thyanx for this vid, however instead of pro-se going sui juris, proper person, freehold byb inheritance
muptahu24 1 year ago
@muptahu24 true indeed moor
noblemoorishgod 1 year ago
@noblemoorishgod peace, keep beingf that light house to those of us trying to navigate in the fog
muptahu24 1 year ago
@muptahu24 each one teach one, check this moor we all should get together and file a class action lawsuit.
noblemoorishgod 1 year ago