John Rambour - off and on
Top Comments
All Comments (38)
-
@drakeneyez: You can't disagree with someone without assuming he's a ... lifeless, obese, insecure parasite. Jesus, man. That's sad.
Why is it so hard for you to listen to someone more experienced in such matters and admit that body CAN be built sans drugs? Stop being so lazy, find some pics taken at almost ANY local-level natural bodybuilding show and compare those physiques to Rambour's. Do that, and even if you're not man enough to admit it to me, admit to yourself that you're wrong.
-
@drakeneyez: Calm down. You're making a real ass of yourself.
As a principle, I don't like to see people being mislead. When an ignorant person like you comes along and says Rambour's physique can't be achieved without using steroids, I don't find that "offensive"; nonetheless, it is definitely not constructive. If a clueless person reads such a lie often enough, he will believe it.
You conflate bodybuilding with drug use. Some of us do not use. What's so hard to understand about that?
-
@senatus besides, you never even answered my question, repeating, why are you so offended by the mention of steroids? if my comment, similar to many many others, has no merit, then you shouldn't be worried, just brush it off your shoulders, but you're insecure, and anal. Just keep questioning other people, without justifying your own words.
-
@senatus proof? oh I apologize, I wasn't aware this was a cyber court room. It's funny though how bullshitters like you who keep rambling nonsense cannot even realize how much they contradict themselves. It's sad and pathetic how you keep asking for proof, when you cannot provide any proof that they don't use steroids, it's just your assumptions, but clearly you have nothing better to assume, it's typical of your type of person. I can conclusively conclude that you're a lifeless parasite. Bye.
-
@senatus "this cat" wtf did you grow up in some 50's nostalgia house, anyway enough with your rambling, anybody as insecure who keeps defending others for their use of steroids has nothing better to do, so you keep rolling your eyes, sit your obese self behind a computer screen, and just keep rambling on, haven't you figured it out that your words mean shit in this world.
-
Draken,
Have you looked up "Marvin Eder" on Youtube yet?
He was more muscular than Mr. Rambour and NEVER took any drugs. (How could he? The motherfucker PREDATED Dr. Ziegler's Dianabol!)
Are you one of these infinite kids who've never trained and stupidly associate ANY development with AAS, or are you a bit sharper (if not particularly articulate) and maintain that this Rambour fellow, for reasons I hope you'll explain, MUST have used something in his prep to look like that onstage?
-
@drakeneyez: Way to miss the point *rolls eyes*
Before '56, when Dianabol was invented (that's one of those boogeyman steroids!), Marvin Eder, Reg Park, Steve Reeves, John Grimek and many other natural bodybuilders carried more mass than Rambour does.
That's simple logic, man. He MIGHT be on something, since naturals have carried more muscle, neither his size or conditioning scream, "This is a guy juiced to the gills."
The way you talk about this cat, you'd think he was Jay Cutler! LMAO.
-
I also see you've no proof that this guy's using anything. I realize that's impossible to conclusively demonstrate, but you could at _least_ try and point out some gyno or something :-\
If we were talking about Michael Lockett or Ade Rai, self-proclaimed naturals who OBVIOUSLY run cycles here and there, you might have a point. As-is, you see a bodybuilder who would be VERY lucky to win a local natural show and think you're clever for accusing him of drug use. That's lame, man.
-
@senatus I highly doubt jon rambour is a bodybuilder from the pre 1956 era
i preffer the off
unsleep 3 years ago 10
Off is WAY better ^^.
AzurePhoenix72 2 years ago 9