Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Molten Metal WTC Thermite 911 Demolition

Molten Metal WTC Thermite 911 Demolition Take a close look at the manner in which WTC 7 collapses straight down. For the building to collapse in this fashion, all of the load bearing supports would...  
 
Customize

More From: 911Demolition

Loading...

QuickList(0)

116 ratings
Sign in to rate
44,017 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (1)

Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (547)   Options

Loading...
Planetary0 (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
NIST FAQ question 11:

"NIST concluded that the source of the molten material was aluminum alloys from the aircraft, since these are known to melt between 475 degrees Celsius and 640 degrees Celsius (depending on the particular alloy), well below the expected temperatures (about 1,000 degrees Celsius) in the vicinity of the fires."

But since no Jews are needed for this theory, it can't be right, can it? ;)
CACBCCCU (1 week ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Just to clarify - WTC2's spilling liquid is glowing hotter than molten iron. Denials of that are not hard to rebut. The usual tricks of denialists are:
1. an absurd "1200C white" chart,
2. photos showing orange/yellow reflections, and
3. pictures of molten iron miscaptioned as aluminum.

Many people would rather believe WTC7 was pre-wired legitimately, like it's a way to keep legitimately-secret information secret, if they take the officially-given destruction mode as BS.
CACBCCCU (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
You have to skip over this spill and the destruction of towers 1 and 2 to point to WTC7's fall as the "smoking gun." I see the same tactical mistake being pushed hard on the Prison Planet forum. Nothing shuts them up like easily dismantling the notion that the spill is below iron's melting point, despite S. Jones wrongly insinuating that the spill was a eutectic glowing cooler than molten iron will glow .
lilcokehed2 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
u actually believe just a plane did this?
laserus333 (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The guy who owned building 7 admitted he ordered them to "pull it" because of damage. but it takes weeks to prepare a building for implosion. Yet they had the explosives already set that was a dead giveaway that this was a set up.
FuzzyNugs420 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+2
Marked as spam
LOL hey to all u fucking idiots saying that planes brought the buildings down.....WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED TO WORLD TRADE CENTER 7.....u know the 3RD building that collapses.....how the fuck did that collapse in 7 seconds??????
hwmetals2000 (1 month ago) Show Hide
+1
Marked as spam
Oxidation like this only happens with a serious catalyst NOT burning jet fuel. As for exactly who or what did this I have no idea but I do know FOR FACT from being in the metals industry for over 20yrs that burning jet fuel alone will NOT CAUSE METAL TO SPARK LIKE THAT EVER! Understand this & you will know that planes alone DID NOT CAUSE THIS! Who knows who or what did. RIP all victims God bless all families & friends adversely affected by this heinous act. "Judgement is Mine", saith the Lord.
Hubieee (1 month ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Who says this is steel melting? Could it be another material from the interiors?
Else the Boltzmann theory of warmth disperson is telling us, that there is a limited amount of molecules that always has a temperature high enough to melt although the actual temperature median is much lower.
 -3
Marked as spam
Google "radioactive mini-nuke fragments"
johndoe268 (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
yes because google is a very reliable source

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.