@s9z9s Like I said about parks, think that a company is gonna renovate and then they start then the councils abort the renovations when companies started and spent money on the park. It was a real cheapshot I know. That happend in 2007 and the councils made some sort of deals with the government because they lost money to the people who immigrated. which is sky high. that never happend during socialist rule. Its just like that some countries work with socialism some not :/
@s9z9s no really I know socialism has a lot of defects it's just that for example not all people who are not "rich" do not won't share their money but just gain. I would say those people are not true socialists as it in a socialist society everyone has to share out their money.
Taking money from workers? Are you saying that they cut he pay of public sector workers? Canceling what companies? And what are you basing this idea of strength on, your GDP?
@s9z9s I dont know when pension date was created but its a long time ago.. The loss of jobs was taking money from workers and cancelling companys for example taking jobs from people who work with industry and giving it to banks and parks, not smart of them... were the 8th strongest country in europe but we need more. we was once 3rd :( look at wikipedia
But what specific actions led to the loss of these jobs? And he's right; it isn't up to the politicians to create prosperity. All they can do is create the ideal conditions to allow wealth to be generated. What date was the retirement age of 65 set one? The 50's, 60's, 70's?
"Fighting for change" today is like trying to fix something that isn't broken
nlytend1 10 hours ago
@s9z9s Like I said about parks, think that a company is gonna renovate and then they start then the councils abort the renovations when companies started and spent money on the park. It was a real cheapshot I know. That happend in 2007 and the councils made some sort of deals with the government because they lost money to the people who immigrated. which is sky high. that never happend during socialist rule. Its just like that some countries work with socialism some not :/
MrDemoify 1 day ago
@s9z9s no really I know socialism has a lot of defects it's just that for example not all people who are not "rich" do not won't share their money but just gain. I would say those people are not true socialists as it in a socialist society everyone has to share out their money.
xxsarusiacutiexx 1 day ago
@xxsarusiacutiexx
Or is it that you didn't like it because it didn't portray socialism in a positive light?
s9z9s 1 day ago
@MrDemoify
But how did the government bankrupt these companies?
s9z9s 1 day ago
So biased...I thought I would learn something from it! Rubbish
xxsarusiacutiexx 1 day ago
@s9z9s from Construction work companies, these was bankrupt today: Stepanovski & Graff Mk Import Handelsbolag
Sophisticated Arms Of Susan AB
Grönbergs Tak & Bygg i Umeå AB
Värmeteknik Jan Olsson AB
Kontor Avenue Kommanditbolag
King Of Sweets & Nuts AB
Cool Solution AB
Duell Medic AB
I dont know of a GDP. But I Think Conservatives are greedy (I think) and dont care about other people
MrDemoify 2 days ago
@MrDemoify
Taking money from workers? Are you saying that they cut he pay of public sector workers? Canceling what companies? And what are you basing this idea of strength on, your GDP?
s9z9s 2 days ago
@s9z9s I dont know when pension date was created but its a long time ago.. The loss of jobs was taking money from workers and cancelling companys for example taking jobs from people who work with industry and giving it to banks and parks, not smart of them... were the 8th strongest country in europe but we need more. we was once 3rd :( look at wikipedia
MrDemoify 2 days ago
@MrDemoify
But what specific actions led to the loss of these jobs? And he's right; it isn't up to the politicians to create prosperity. All they can do is create the ideal conditions to allow wealth to be generated. What date was the retirement age of 65 set one? The 50's, 60's, 70's?
s9z9s 2 days ago