9/11 Truth Documentary - Grave Implications

Grave Implications a Documentary of Explosives in the World Trade Center

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Government
• 911
• 9/11
• Documentary
• new
• world
• order
• september
• attacks
• attack
• NYC
• Twin
• Towers
• Building
• truth
• alex
• jones
• commentary
• analysis
• documentary
• grassroots
• outreach
• news
• political
• commercial

[AhzekAhriman1]

One of the things I would be questioning here is why building 7 fell the same way the twin towers fell when a plane never hit it? Fair enough a plane could make a skyscraper fall but debris from a falling building making another tower fall so beautifully it fell into it's own footprint. Now that's suspicious.

[stellar876]

@"How does a country profit from war." Are you not aware of something called oil? Halliburton, Cheney and war contracts? Wake up man!

[666rebels]

What a load of bollocks. Even people with an untrained eye can see the outer columns buckling first then it give way. It's that fuckin obvious, even the south tower which was hit on an angle, you can see top of tower falling into the weakened columns. Get fucked with explosives.

[2000tc88]

@Robinhim2002 "Whats the matter" is, just what I said,you did NOT bother to read my comments right through.I quoted what HE said.If you are who you say you are then you should know that Thermite would be expected to be found,if it was not there then that would be strange.

I get sick of trying to reason with people like you who do not bother to read what I said and then start going on about thermite and controlled demo.

WTC 7 was taken away in the same manner as 1,2.

Direct Energy Weapon.

[Robinhim2002]

@BigMikeTH3V1K1NG How about the "blank check" and moral imperitive to invade a nation, take a strong military position in the middle east, take over a nations oil reserves, and make billions of dollars for companies like Haliburton and cause the price of oil to approach 5 dollars resulting in record profits for oil companies. Are you kidding. We could only enter WWII after pearl Harbor, another "attack" that raises lots of questions. How about Vietnam, we got involved there because of an "attack

[Robinhim2002]

@Kingcosie Our government said there where no bombs. Despite what all those eye witnesses said. Isnt it clear no one wants to investigate this matter. Our government has lied to us. This is not the first time, its just so difficult to believe that this sort of act could be committed against our own people and be used to invade a country and start a War. Thousands of people killed over a lie, God will judge us all.

[Robinhim2002]

@2000tc88 Hey man ...whats the matter, cant use reason so you use profanity. I get it ..you dont! I served my country with honor. Did you! Traitor? Really. Oh and by the way .whats your explanation again for tower 7 falling into its footprint in the exact same manner as towers 1 and 2? Ever heard of "thermite", its a military grade incendenary charge ...my mates tell me. It was found in the debris samples. No big deal right? You will be happy to know I will be getting a 2nd degree next month!!

[2000tc88]

@Robinhim2002 Ok,Your a Navy Vet,you have a degree in Nuclear {Enginneering}. OOHHHH Fuck,You`re like him.DID you bother to read my comment right through. NOOOOO,you did not. HE SAID,I QUOTE,"The Central Columns Collapsed INTO Themselves". JUST HOW THE FUCK DOES STEEL COLLAPSE INTO ITSELF. It Can`t. It can bend or Buckle. YOU believe Demo and your a VET. TRAITOR. 11 stories EVERY second By DEMO,FUCK OFF. Ask your SEAL mates if they could do that. TURN the TOWERS to DUST,FUCK OFF

[Robinhim2002]

@2000tc88 I agree with you, the official story is bogus. What did you not agree with from the EE from MIT. Physics disputes the official claim. It is imposssible to think that all three buildings would fall at virtual free fall, as if in a vacuum. This is physics, acceleration of gravity 9.8m/s^2 , a falling object. Its basic mechanics, introductory physics. Thus something had to be done to the building to get it to collaspe in that manner. Demolition charge explosions where apparently used.

[2000tc88]

@Robinhim2002 Of course it does,the problem with physics as you say is that it doesnt match up with what happened on that day.The pile of debris did not mach the mass of the towers.You can clearly see in videos the towers turning to dust in mid air and being blown away by the wind.As soon as the top section starts to drop they start to turn to dust,they should have pancaked down.POINT being,OFFICIAL story is CRAP.What do you think caused three buildings to go away.

[Robinhim2002]

@2000tc88 How about physics....does that qualify. By the way the first two years of engineering is the same no matter what your expertise, with a few exceptions your base classes are the same. Certainly a MIT trained individual can grapple with the principles of demolition. What would you say caused the entire collapse of three modern skyskrappers? If you listen to the entire account this dude is credible, by the way I have a degree in Nuclear enginneering technology and am a Navy Vet of 12 yrs