John Kerry Says WTC 7 Brought Down In Controlled Fashion

http://abuse-of-power.org
John Kerry Says WTC 7 Brought Down Intentionally In Controlled Fashion Because Of Danger It Was Posing To Surrounding Buildings.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 911
• WTC
• collapse
• controlled
• demolition

[Stepper11]

How did they set the charges? It was ad hoc while the building was ablaze, amidst all the smoke,mayhem,detritus,& carnage? Really? A short bus 3rd grader might buy that.The building was clearly brough down by controlled demolition.But the charges had to be there already,which proves that there was a plot to bring down 7.Which opens the door to a similar plot w/ the other buildings that came down in similar fashion.A thorough investigation would be nice. But how? They tossed all the evidence.

[messagetojames]

WHY WAS BUILDING 7 RIGGED FOR EXPLOSIVES is the questions people should be answering this question , as their is no doubt that it was a controlled demo as was the WTC 1 and 2. The problem here is this : "Human Beings would rather live as lie if comfortable, then the truth however uncomfortable" and this is just too good an example of just that, who wants to admit the truth after being taken for so long and over such a horrible thing ...CGJames...saving humanity.......

[DTK5689]

I believe all large buildings are rigged for explosives when the are constructed in the event they need to be "pulled" for safety. :)

[MultiSr16]

whooops.. 911 was an inside job

[ctcole77]

LMAO! Another 911 doufus using the edit switch! Kerry said they evacuated WTC7 in a controlled fashion. In fact, I dont recall kerry EVER even mentioning the word "demolition".

[ctcole77]

911 was an OUTSIDE job!

[woodenmajor]

i was happy to see that a recent poll confirmed that nearly 87% of polled "truthers " still live in their mom's basement ,spending the bulk of their time playing "doom " and watching old episodes of "mission preposterous " ,"i spy" and movies with lots of inane car chases and unlikely pyro technics ...this would suggest that most wont actually ever impregnate any real world females and thereby futher endanger the already dubious gene pool of the ever more dumbed down american population .

[wimahlers]

@crisisofconsciousnes I haven't heard from you in a while. But about that debate, her is one:

forums"randi"org/showthread"ph­p?p=7473191

You really wish to do this all over again?

Anyway, instead of a debate I suggest you contact an accredited subject matter knowledgeable scientific source first. Like a relevant university. But that is just me. 'Cause me having not the required knowledge, I have to rely on verifiable accredited scientific sources.

As for a debate, I refer to the debate.

[wimahlers]

@crisisofconsciousnes,

.

"embarrass myself?"

.

Yes! Stop embarrassing yourself by using Jenings.

You claim Jennings was threatened with loosing his job because of what he said about WTC 7. There is not a shred of evidence for that. Embarrassing.

You claim Jennings meant he saw dead people. He indeed did say that on that stressful day itself. A lot was said in the heat of the moment. However, he later explained himself. It really is embarrassing to still use Jennings street interview.