The Detailed Position Of Planet X ~ R.S. Harrington

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,296
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 15, 2011

Looking at Dr. R.S. Harrington's Theoretical Orbit of Planet X.
Video of the 1990 Sitchin/Harrington Interview. Note at time 5:12 Harrington draws a COUNTER CLOCKWISE Planet X orbit OUTSIDE of Plutos orbit, and then places Planet X on the OUTBOUND leg. EXACTLY the same as the Theoretical orbit he published in 1988 that My video is based on: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N8eGVe14sIU
The location of Harrington's Theoretical Planet X:
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1988AJ.....96.1476H/0001476.000.html
2002 Zecharia Sitchin Interview stating Nibiru will not return until 3,440 AD: Will Planet X / Nibiru Return in 2003? http://yowusa.com/planetx/2002/planetx-2002-06a/1.shtml

Dec/2011 Dr. Lorenzo Iorio paper stating a Mars-Sized body would have to be at least 150 to 200 AU away, "We analytically work out the long-term variations caused on the motion of a planet orbiting a star by a very distant, pointlike massive object X. Apart from the semi-major axis a, all the other Keplerian osculating orbital elements experience long-term variations which are complicated functions of the orbital configurations of both the planet itself and of X...": http://arxiv.org/abs/1101.2634

2012: No Planet X, "According to these publications, most of the IRAS observations in the 1984 paper were distant, ultra-luminous young galaxies and one was a filamentary structure known as "infrared cirrus" floating in intergalactic space. IRAS never observed any astronomical body in the outer reaches of the Solar System...": http://www.universetoday.com/14486/2012-no-planet-x/

Unidentified IRAS sources - Ultrahigh-luminosity galaxies, "Optical imaging and spectroscopy measurements were obtained for six of the high galactic latitude infrared sources reported by Houck, et al. (1984) from the IRAS survey to have no obvious optical counterparts on the POSS prints. All are identified with visually faint galaxies that have total luminosities in the range 5 x 10 to the 11th power stellar luminosity to 5 x 10 to the 12th power stellar luminosity...": http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1985ApJ...290L...5H&a...

Planet X - No dynamical evidence in the optical observations ~ E. M Standish: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/full/1993AJ....105.2000S

Video - How I Killed Pluto & Why It Had It Coming - Mike Brown: http://www.keckobservatory.org/news/how_i_killed_pluto_why_it_had_it_coming_t...

Tom Van Flandern, the Planet X instigator;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Van_Flandern

Planet X disproved: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_X#Planet_X_disproved

Skyview's Disappearing Videos: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXjh6cah5UE

Astrolpatriot, and Skyview Exposed as Hoax. Video made in late October: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SSiHaNVmreU

Do Not Trust the "Skyview team": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7NkR2G_HtQ

GRAS 4 image of Skyview location;
http://s319.photobucket.com/albums/mm477/ngchunter/?action=view&current=s...

2006 Image of Neptune and Triton used in Skyview video; http://www.xanaduobservatory.com/NeptuneAndTriton.jpg From here; http://www.xanaduobservatory.com/solarsystem.htm

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (TBar1984)

  • Planet X is in Aquarius at these coordinates: 22h03m53.36s , -12°28'31.2''. (Skyview Team Data).

  • @TrueHamal Where are the Skyview Videos? I can't seem to find any. Oh, that right, Skyview was a HOAX. I'll bet you fell for the ELEnin HOAX as well. Here, look at a video by a Skyview 'Insider': /watch?v=SSiHaNVmreU

  • Show me a chart that NASA has nothing to do with then I may believe you.

  • @jnrmack Harrington didn't work for NASA. Harrington's Planet X is what most people think about when you mention Planet X. What problem do you have with Harrington's own paper detailing HIS Planet X Orbit?

see all

All Comments (50)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @governmentexposure You should DO some Research. You are repeating lies. Look at the 3rd link up above, and GO THERE. Note the "Dr. Gerry Neugebauer, co-investigator in the IRAS project, was interviewed and strongly stated that what IRAS had seen was not “incoming mail”, and READ the rest of the articles. I don't know where your getting your info, but I strongly suggest you READ the papers released by the principle investigators on the project.

  • @governmentexposure Those are HARRINGTON'S OWN coordinates. Look at the links shown in the video. You are stating outright lies, I don't like people who stoop that low.

  • @governmentexposure You can't READ, or have absolutely no reading comprehension. It's all there, links included. The title of the video is Planet-X ~ HARRINGTON. Are you saying all those old papers by HARRINGTON are bogus?

    Please READ before making FOOLS of yourselves.

  • @AreYouHappyYet Again, THEY DID FUCKING FIND IT!! Please, people, before making yourself look stupid.. do research before opening your mouth about the subject would ya? I mean, that's all we ask of you. 1983 - NASA launched its infared satellite called 'IRAS' - The infared technology of that satellite, is what exposed Nibiru to the people at NASA. I have the fucking article from 1983 when they published it!!! For the love of God people.. please, do more research!!!

  • @Tetrohedracon He doesn't have the correct cooridnates.. which is why hes not looking at the correct object. Which again, is why this video is incorrect.

  • This guy has no idea what hes talking about. Absolutely none. NASA discovered Nibiru way back in 1983.. and they've known about it ever since then. It's not in an "outbound" trajectory.. its in an 'inbound' trajectory. No idea where you got your information.. but its incorrect like most of the rest of these "nibiru videos".

  • Planet-X is a term givin to unidentified planets or just unidentified objects if size is reasonable. On the account that it doesint match the orbit of what we are told...I don't think you're lookin at wormwood/murduk/nibiru/planet of the crossing.

  • many celestial objects have been dubbed planet x in the past the incredibly ignorant have even called elenin planet x lol, but seriously there are so many different suggestions as to what or even where planet x is i was just wondered why you picked this particular one, i heard of an object thought to be 36k AU from the sun in the outer oort cloud that was purposed i dont know whats your take on this

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more