KITZMILLER VS DOVER REVISITED PART 1 OF 4

REVISITING THE KITZMILLER TRIAL AND EXPOSING THE PBS PROPAGANDA PIECE CALLED JUDGEMENT DAY.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• KITZMILLER
• EVOLUTION

[system01]

Judge Jones summed up what ID is all about.

After all the shame\humiliation the defense went through in the courts and their hometown of Dover, it is horribly disgusting someone is still trying to justify it, only religious people\criminals could sink this low

[jsloan777]

@system01 Judge Jones did no such thing. Only someone as ignorant as you would make such a claim. shame and humiliation go along with the territory when you engage in perjury as the defendants did. I am in no way defending that, fool.

What I am defending is the expert testimony of the ID experts who did not lie about anything and whom the opposition never touched. what is disgusting is the hit piece nova did with their BS. Got any more stupid comments ?

[system01]

@jsloan777 If "Judge Jones did no such thing" then what's the difference between ID and creationism?

Also the only other major organization that actually support ID is islam. So much for the the Scientific aspect of ID. Even though christians and muslims have teamed up in support of ID they still haven't been able to get it in any credible educational institution. WHY?? well because ID is BS\Creationism.

[jsloan777]

@system01 ID does not require a supernatural force as Behe pointed out and Jones ignored. Crick's Panspermia theory and SETI's explorations are examples of ID in action.Credible educational systems? you mean like the NGS who put fraudulent fossils on display? You mean like the ones who put Haekel's fraudulent embryo drawings in biology textbooks ? That's real BS !!!

[jsloan777]

@beaviselectron What a joke you are. a typical know-nothing Atheist who who has nothing to offer up, but knit-picking and empty rhetoric. And your unwillingness to continue speaks volumes as to you being nothing but an empty suit. Blah blah blah.

[beaviselectron]

@jsloan777 - Actually, the proper grammatical response would be to say "Generalities ARE all you have", not "is." Might add credibility to your argument if you could properly construct a sentence. Or maybe not.

And I don't have time to bait you, so I won't. But my unwillingness to continue does not validate your argument: Religion is NOT science. The Kitzmiller case simply publicly pronounced it and helped to set a precedent, especially when showing how the defendants lied.

[jsloan777]

@beaviselectron Generalities is all you have, Try getting into detail and I'll be impressed.

And if you're too busy with your businesses, don't get involved in debates that you can't engage in. Empty rhetoric from you doesn't mean squat to me.

[beaviselectron]

@jsloan777 - You CAN read, right? Fish your head out of your *** and realize that I am replying in generality; your video content is vaccuous and largely conclusive based on your own point of view. Many of the tenets of your conclusions are supposition and speculation and have no reasonable foundation outside of the realm of your mind.

Now, if you'll excuse me, I have two businesses to run and was interrupted by your reply in my Inbox. It merits a BRIEF response but nothing more.

[jsloan777]

@beaviselectron And what a surprise, no rebuttals coming from you just empty rhetoric.

Try rebutting an argument for a change and show me that you actually know something.

[beaviselectron]

Shallow and surface logic, name calling, selective conclusions...this Sloan fellow is a riot! I'll watch the other three parts if for no other reason than morbid amusement. I hope no one actually PAID him for this work...