God of flesh and bones?
Loading...
Loading...
694
views
Loading...
4:36
The Cross vs mormonsby testskriftene2,945 views- 1:32
Why Do People Say Mormonism is a Cult?by LDSPublicAffairs71,455 views
- 9:09
God NEVER intended...by bulldogfaith122,137 views
- 8:52
The Word Became Fleshby nwameme86828 views
- 9:40
Thai Bible "Who is Jesus"by khmerandenglish1,199 views
- 4:13
One Peaceful Nightby thinhtut394 views
- 5:35
If Christ is God why does he have flesh and bones?by INCQuest2,654 views
- 1:44
Traveling Pastor in the Pub - Tooeleby bornagainmormoncom2,169 views
- 13:11
Why Allah (God) forbids eating The Flesh of The Swine?by zaidg45,031 views
- 9:30
SFA 11 02 08 Part 3by christianroots75 views
- 6:56
God tells us what Heaven looks like; No more painby SparklePeace68,760 views
- 11:00
What think ye of Christ? whose son is he?by nwameme86891 views
- 5:42
Celtic Frost - A Dying God Coming Into Human Fleshby CelticFrostOfficial880,677 views
- 8:26
SKIN, FLESH & BONES - I got to go on without you - reggae 7"by wikidub1,887 views
- 2:47
1890 LDS - D&C removed chaptersby testskriftene3,893 views
- 10:08
Celtic Legacy - Resurrectionby Gargaroth416,409 views
- 3:12
Born In The '70s - The Fruit Batsby jamespcollier18,444 views
- 3:27
Flesh and Boneby zzz33333586 views
- 5:22
Gitaroo Man - Born to Be Boneby trofl75,139 views
- 1:59
LDS ignorance - Righteous Mormons?by testskriftene2,922 views
there can only be one high priest... only one Melch priest... I have a video of it...
God bless
testskriftene 3 years ago
Okay, that's cool. I believe Jesus Christ later ordained other high priests by the laying on of hands. But a high priest only holds that authority so long as he is living worthy of it, and he can only use it in a way that Christ would have used it. Christ doesn't technically NEED them, but it gives them an opportunity to learn to be like Him through service.
RedViking1 3 years ago
the reply was meant for this one...
testskriftene 3 years ago
Yes, and he had no genealogy like Melch... He made the perfect sacrifice once and for all... ++
testskriftene 3 years ago
But why did the same act mean different things to different people? Surely something else made Christ our high priest?
RedViking1 3 years ago
Priest after the order of Melch... There is only one priest after the order of Melch.. Jesus is our only High Priest...
Johns baptism for other was baptism for repentance..
testskriftene 3 years ago
Yes, I agree that Jesus had to have been baptized, but maybe my question wasn't clear. If his baptism alone made him our high priest, how is it that everyone baptized that same day by the same authority (John) is not our high priest also. There must have been something else to set Jesus apart as a high priest, right?
RedViking1 3 years ago
If Jesus was not baptised - he would not have become a High priest after the order of Melch... all people here on earth that are baptised are baptised as a good covenant to God
testskriftene 3 years ago
Certainly Christ is our High Priest, but it couldn't be his baptism alone that did that. If so, than all those baptized that day would be our high priests, and that's not the case.
Thank you for the reference. 1 Cor 15 is one of my favorite chapters in the NT. My favorite is verse 49: "And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly."
I pray that I can bear the earthly image as Christlike as possible, that I my have a Christlike heavenly image.
RedViking1 3 years ago
Jesus was baptised because He became our High Priest (the only in existence)...
The Gospel:
Read 1. Cor 15! You have a different gospel - then go and read Galatians...
God bless you
testskriftene 3 years ago