South Tower Anomalies III - Addressing the Debunkers
Uploader Comments (dayjoborchestra)
Top Comments
-
This does raise a few questions. As far as conspiracies goes, one has to be carefull with not letting ones imagination go too wild, but it is 'always' right to question something and do deep investigations.
-
nice vid... to the point
so..can we have answers
All Comments (251)
-
I would say that overwhelming evidence has proven the no-planers to be disinformants/whackos.
More likely the US state manipulated extremists into carrying out these attacks, and aided them in such ways as standing down NORAD. No-planes, though? That's insane.
-
@shizumaoo Oh!
Oh wait! when you zoom in on the video 1 at around 9:00, you can make out the plane as a miragey distortion.
It's gotta be an optical illusion. :0
-
could the plane be the same color as the blue background, and they altered the background to increase visability?
-
I like the fact that some people are saying this video is 'irrational'. This video presents evidence and asks questions, there's no wild accusations or idea that go off on a tangent. Please use phrases you understand, not just things you have heard other people say!
-
q.1, why is the plane not visible in the live feed.
the plane is obstructed by the buildings. your angles are wrong,
q.2, the orb?yes the orb could be the plane, or it could be a spec of dirt on the helicopter window???
q.3, the high stationary camera as you put it is a much lower angle that you think, you are not seeing the top of the building at all it just looks like that because of what was on the tower and the smokes position is the same in both angles making an identical optical image.
-
Why the heck the plane isn't visible in the live feed, I _DEFINITELY_ do not know, and would really like to find out... but I can guaran-da*n-tee that the second plane existed, and definitely hit the south tower precisely when it was said to. As for the rest of the conspiracy... Well, it's one heck of a quandry, isn't it?
the reason for the difference in the camera shots is simple: the 'typical helicopter footage' are close-ups. You guys are video producers so you know what I'm talking about. The footage of WTC was a wide shot, therefore looks steadier.
Stick to making comedy vids guys :)
SyndicalistTimes 6 days ago
@SyndicalistTimes We are video producers and we know what we're talking about. We will do what we wish. Closeups and far shots both move, especially from a helicopter. My guess is the footage was "stabilized", chroma keyed, and the planes were added in by someone really good and really fast at great secrecy & expense. It would follow that this talented editor is probably dead.
dayjoborchestra 6 days ago
@dayjoborchestra
mate, I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if 9/11 was an inside job, but the no-plane theory is garbage.
SyndicalistTimes 4 days ago
@SyndicalistTimes No theory is garbage. Theories are ideas brought to light. Theories are easily disproven, or proven, given evidence. Prove there were planes; if it's so obvious.
dayjoborchestra 3 days ago
Not one new yorker south, east or west of the wtc has come forward as a witness to the absence of a plane. Thousands of people saw the south tower impact with their own eyes from NJ to Brooklyn. You guys seem totally for real and are extremely talented, i find it disturbing that you would promote the work of a sociopathic crack head who has physically assaulted members of We Are Change on a number of occasions. Ever hear of turd in the punchbowl? He shat it, you are dilligently dishing it out.
educution 1 year ago 2
@educution Ever been downtown New York? Surrounded by buildings, I'm sure many people had a clear view of the entire skyline. What of the live NBC videos that show a blue sky and no plane? Try to answer without insults please; show the world that you have a point, besides the end of your sword!
dayjoborchestra 11 months ago